Loading...
See More

New Joburg planning rules 'a disaster'

Dec 05 2011 14:46 I-Net Bridge

Related Articles

'Land reform proposal may be unconstitutional'

Sapoa wary of 'severe' Consumer Act

Super rich buying houses again

Good news for SA shareholders

SA's once-hot property funds lose shine

House prices continue to deflate - Absa

 
Johannesburg - The City of Johannesburg's new town planning scheme is unworkable, said the  South African Property Owners Association (Sapoa) on Monday.

The City of Johannesburg implemented a new town planning scheme last week -  the Consolidated Johannesburg Town Planning Scheme 2011 - which aims to combine over a dozen different planning schemes or zoning regulations in Johannesburg into one set of uniform zoning provisions, without altering existing zoning or development rights attached to any particular property.

However, Sapoa has argued that instead of streamlining town planning, the errors and inadequacies of the scheme are so severe that the city needs to go back to the drawing board.

Sapoa also pointed to a number of alarming "bombshells" buried in its fine print.

An effective appropriation of rights without compensation arose from a clause that provided for approved rights which were not exercised within 24 months to become "null and void".

The scheme also stated that the municipality was not bound by its own town planning scheme.

Sapoa CEO Neil Gopal said: "We acknowledge that there is a need for a town planning scheme that ensures the regulation of land is uniform and more efficient throughout the municipal area, but this is not what this document does."

According to Sapoa's professional and legal advice, the 2011 Johannesburg Town Planning scheme contradicted itself in numerous places, referred to schedules and annexures not in the document, contained an abundance of inadequate and confusing definitions, and even contradicted other legislation, such as its definition of an "erf" which does not conform with the Land Survey Act.

"In general the new scheme is poorly compiled. The meaning and interpretation of many provisions is impossible to understand - either logically or legally," according to Gopal, who said this was the conclusion reached by a large number of professionals and practitioners in the field of town planning.

"In fact, three full sections were missing from the copy supplied to Sapoa and despite repeated efforts requesting this information, we have yet to receive it.

"The lack of interaction in terms of acknowledgement of letters, submissions made, requests for information, and so forth, from the City of Johannesburg is a worrying trend."

He noted that this was only one in a long chain of events where the city has switched off to the needs of its commercial property owners and homeowners, who are the largest ratepayers.

He said: "We, and other professionals, intend to lodge an appeal to the Townships Board."

city of johannesburg  |  sapoa
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
9 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

Retailers of any shape and size can now unlock the power of mobile transacting.
 
 

Hottie of the day: Nicole Meyer!

Nicole is the cover girl for the 2014 edition of SA Swimsuit! Check out some smoking hot pics of here here.

 
 

Men24.com

11 things men don’t know about their clothes
Hilarious mortal kombat elevator prank!
This is how the Top Gear presenters spend their £55 million!
Thirty and still single? There’s hope!

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...