Moody's downgrades five SA banks
Johannesburg - Credit rating agency Moody's Investors Service has downgraded by one notch the senior debt and deposit ratings of five South African banks. The banks are Standard Bank Group [JSE:SBK], Absa Bank [JSE:ASA], FirstRand [JSE:FSR], Nedbank [JSE:NED] and Investec [JSE:INL].
The downgrades reflect the impact of the country's increasingly constrained public finances and Moody's view that authorities would face challenging policy choices if multiple institutions were to need its financial support at the same time, Moody's said in a statement on Wednesday.
The downgrades are part of Moody's global assessment of the systemic support levels incorporated in banks' deposit and debt ratings, which addresses the growing difficulties governments face in extending systemic support to their banking systems.
"Today's rating action is not driven by a deterioration in the standalone financial strength or the financial performance of these five institutions and concludes Moody's review for downgrade of these banks, initiated on 10 November 2011," it said.
In addition, Moody's also downgraded by one notch the subordinated debt instruments of these banks, in addition to African Bank's EMTN subordinated debt programme ratings.
These downgrades reflect the removal of systemic support assumptions from the subordinated debt instruments of South African banks, prompted by Moody's expectation that authorities will likely make greater use of their resolution tools to allow burden sharing with subordinated bondholders.
Moody's reassessment of the support environment assumes a reduced
capacity of the SA authorities to provide support to financial
institutions if needed. This reduced capacity is also signalled by the
negative outlook on South Africa's A3 rating, which reflects the potential
of increased pressure on the government's finances.
The reassessment is
in line with recent global trends, where sovereigns dealing with a
systemic banking crisis possess more limited options and face constrains
in providing financial support.
The change in systemic support assumptions has resulted in the reduction
of systemic support rating uplift to one notch from two notches before, for the five largest South African banks.
Despite the South African government's more constrained financial flexibility to absorb banking-related contingent liabilities under a tail-risk scenario, Moody's believes that systemic support is still warranted in the banks' ratings as the authorities have sufficient powers to intervene, despite some constraints.
"In addition, Moody's does not foresee any meaningful political resistance from either the government or the electorate that would compromise in any significant way Sarb's (the South African Reserve Bank's) willingness and ability to support the banking system.
"Moody's also believes that the five largest South African banks are systemically important institutions for the country's payment system, and that authorities would be willing to support them if required," it said.
Moody's has also removed systemic support from the subordinated debt instruments of South African banks. The rating action was prompted by the rating agency's view that systemic support may not be extended to these instruments in case of financial distress.
Subordinated debt is typically recognised in banks' capital structure as Tier 2 capital, and we expect South African authorities to make greater use of their resolution tools to allow burden sharing with subordinated bondholders.
Subordinated debt is now rated one notch lower than a bank's standalone rating or adjusted standalone rating in the case of Absa Bank that incorporates parental support, while any undated junior subordinated debt is rated two notches below the standalone rating or adjusted standalone rating.
Following the adjustment in Absa Bank's ratings to reflect the lower systemic support, Absa Bank's ratings have been left on review, in line with the review for downgrade of the standalone ratings of its parent, Barclays Bank (which owns 55.5% of Absa Bank), announced on 15 February 2012.02.29
The review indicates that Barclay's A3 standalone credit strength, as reflected by its BFSR of C, could be lowered to either the same level as Absa's Baa1 standalone credit strength, or lower.
Consequently, Moody's will review the parental support incorporated in Absa's ratings, following the conclusion of Barclay's standalone rating review and an assessment of its financial capacity to support its African subsidiary if required.
Moody's notes that Absa's ratings currently benefit from one notch of rating uplift due to parental support from a financially stronger parent bank, which may no longer be the case going forward.
Moody's also acknowledges that Absa, which accounts for approximately 10% of Barclays group's total revenues, will continue to benefit from and leverage the banking and operational expertise available from the parent bank.
Furthermore, Absa remains a self-sufficient and operationally independent entity without any funding dependence from Barclays.
Any indication of a weakening of the South African authorities'
willingness to support any of the above-mentioned banks or any
significant deterioration in their capacity to extend financial support, could negatively affect the banks' deposit and debt ratings.
Moody's believes there is little likelihood of any upward rating momentum driven by increased systemic support for the banks covered by today's announcement, or from a strengthening of their standalone credit assessments in the currently challenging economic environment.
Someone should downgrade Moody's as a ratings mechanism. They can not sit still for even one week and say things are looking good.
well reading beween the line it does not appear that there is much confidence in a accumulative government bail out. Secondly we now have confirmation on the resaons why government has never stood up to the banks on charges and services. The reserve bank supports our extremely expensive banking system.
That is true, Hugh. However, the high bank fees are, in part due to 3rd party operators and no competition. To pay to deposit cash into your account over the counter in a bank branch is ludicrous and unheard of anywhere else in the world. The problem is the cash handling fees that SBV and COIN charge. Somehow the SARB needs to step in and force the charges down to a level when the banks can absorb the fees.
The other is the exorbitant fees that SASwitch charges for electronic transactions. With more and more reliance on cards, these fees need to be brought in line with the fees that BANKServ charge for local transfers. I have not seen the recent costs but BANKServ charge around 18 cents per transaction whereas SASwitch charge over R6 per transaction.
The last problem is collusion between the banks (except for Capitec) over rates and fees. Also, why do all the bank charge lending rates exactly at 3.5& above PRIME? Surely they can be allowed to lend between the PRIME rate and the 3.5%?
The problem, as I see it, the Big 4 run the show exclusively and collude between themselves on everything. If anyone knew the blocks they throw up against Capitec the would be astounded. Yet Capitec is taking market share away from them at a rapidly growing rate. 100k new account per month. Until that changes and someone stands up to the Big 4 nothing will change as regards to banking in SA>
I really do hear you both but we must realise the role of the Reserve Bank in the economy - and that it is a "separate" and independent body from the government, and I'm wondering how true it is that lending can only be done at 3,5% or above PRIME coz I know a few people who have lent in between and the repo rate is around 5% the banks can't lend below what it costs them to borrow... Moody should take into account that we all went through the same financial crisis and no bank of ours needed bailing and cushioning etc...
The Moody's rating system is an indication of our standing in the sophisticated world of finance. It will not be positive if teh outlook is negative, and a downgrade is not easily made - which means SA should look at the situation as a message for pre-emptive behaviour, i.e. corrective economic and financial measures - which our ANC government is not good at, sadly. The problems really begin when this downgrade becomes a trend.. That is where Greece, Italy and Spain ended up. In SA that situation would lead to a major 'popular' upheaval, as the economy would leave close to 40-50% unemployed: an explosive banana republic on the skids..