Share

Inside Labour: Constitutional confusion

OUR justly praised constitution and the institutions it created have taken something of a verbal battering over the past week and more - and often for the wrong reasons. In the process, the office of the public protector has become something of a surrogate battleground for the opposing factions in Cosatu.

The South African Communist Party (SACP) and senior elements within the governing ANC - along with several trade union affiliates of the union federation - have ranted about Pubic Protector Thuli Madonsela and her office. At the same time, Cosatu general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi has condemned criticism of the public protector and committed the federation to support Madonsela and her office.

However, superseding these squabbles this week were some evidently racist comments directed at the constitution and the Constitutional Court over its decision in the Renate Barnard case supported by the Solidarity union. 

Barnard and her union have fought an eight-year battle on the grounds that she was discriminated against on a racial basis by being refused promotion she had applied and been recommended for.

What all these often robust criticisms have in common seems to be a misrepresentation of the facts, especially about the Employment Equity Act and the role of the public protector. Whether many of these are a result of deliberate distortion, misunderstanding or ignorance is open to question.

But what the Concourt decision has done is to open up the whole debate about affirmative action and the Employment Equity Act. This is to be welcomed, especially if more people become aware of the details and the law applying to affirmative action.

What must be made clear in the Barnard case is that the Concourt did not come down in favour of discrimination on any grounds. In fact, the post applied for by Barnard was filled initially by a white man of senior rank who was “moved sideways” into the job.

What the court stresses is that affirmative action measures must be rational and not punitive or retaliatory. It also warns that efficiency and competence must not be compromised in applying policies that aim to redress historic wrongs.

However, this case is - as the eight years of court cases show - a fairly complicated matter that will doubtless keep lawyers engaged in arguments for years. The fact that the post in question was deemed non-essential and was later abolished is only part of this.

Rather less complicated is the case of public protector who, along with her office, has been castigated for properly fulfilling the role clearly laid out in section 182 of the constitution. And an element of paranoia seems to be present in most of these attacks.

The SACP, for example, has claimed that Madonsela’s comments have “become increasingly laced with those of one opposition party”.

The South African Democratic Teachers’ Union (Sadtu) went even further, stating: "The actions of Advocate Thuli Madonsela are clear systematic signs planned to create anarchy and divisions within our society and the ANC in particular."

ANC secretary general Gwede Mantshe and his deputy, Jesse Duarte, also questioned Madonsela’s conduct and cast aspersions on her credibility. But Vavi noted: “We find very disturbing the type of comments, the conspiracy theories, and the downright insults that have been directed at the office of the public protector."

This statement revealed again the divisions that are threatening to tear Cosatu apart, because Sadtu is one of the federation’s largest affiliates. It lines up with the majority of the Cosatu executive and the SACP in an increasingly bitter wrangle within Cosatu that, Vavi admits, is weakening the federation.

With more time and resources spent on politicking there has been a general decline in service to members, leading to a drop in overall union membership. Cosatu has never been able fully to justify its claim to represent “more than 2 million organised workers”. It is now clearly some way off that mark.

This fraying at the edges has triggered a fear of fragmentation and frantic demands to preserve unity at all costs. But unity will not be preserved until and unless the underlying issues are resolved, once and for all.

And the key here lies with the Cosatu constitution and the legitimate demand by nine affiliates for a special national congress. Such a democratic gathering would enable delegates to confront, debate and finally resolve the issues that are damaging the federation and the labour movement as a whole.

 - Fin24

* What do you think? Add your voice to the employment equity and labour debate or ask Terry a labour-related question.

*Terry Bell is a political, economic and labour analyst. Views expressed are his own. Follow him on twitter @telbelsa.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.89
+0.3%
Rand - Pound
23.87
+0.1%
Rand - Euro
20.38
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.32
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.2%
Platinum
908.05
0.0%
Palladium
1,014.94
0.0%
Gold
2,232.75
-0.0%
Silver
24.95
-0.1%
Brent Crude
87.00
+1.8%
Top 40
68,346
0.0%
All Share
74,536
0.0%
Resource 10
57,251
0.0%
Industrial 25
103,936
0.0%
Financial 15
16,502
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders