Share

Kuruman mining case heads to ConCourt

Johannesburg - The Constitutional Court will hear an application on Tuesday for leave to appeal against a decision on the mining rights of properties in Kuruman in the Northern Cape.

The application is being brought by the mineral resources minister, her director general and deputy director general, and the regional manager of the department in the province, and Imperial Crown Trading (ICT).

Before the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA) came into effect, Sishen Iron Ore Company and Arcelor Mittal South Africa (AMSA) both held undivided shares of a mining right in the properties on which Sishen's mine was located, and which were issued in terms of the Minerals Act of 1991.

Sishen held 78.6% of the shares and AMSA 21.4%.

The MPRDA entitled holders of mineral rights under previous legislation to convert their old order mining rights within five years of the act coming into operation. If they failed to do so the rights expired.

Sishen converted its shares, but AMSA did not.

ICT applied for a prospecting right in respect of AMSA's share and Sishen applied for a mining right in respect of AMSA's expired share.

The minister granted a prospecting right to ICT and declined Sishen's application for mining rights.

Sishen then applied to the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to have the decision reviewed, and set aside the granting of the prospecting rights to ICT.

AMSA, which joined as a party, sought a declarator to the effect that Sishen had been granted 100% mining rights when it was converting its shares.

The high court found that Sishen had been granted full mining rights and therefore set aside the grant of the prospecting right to ICT.

The State applicants and ICT unsuccessfully appealed against the order in the Supreme Court of Appeal.

The matter was then taken to the Constitutional Court.

The applicants were arguing that the matter raised constitutional issues since it related to the interpretation of legislation.

They argued that the minister's grant of full rights to Sishen was a mistake which could have been corrected in terms of the MPRDA.

Sishen and AMSA argued that the matter did not raise any constitutional issues since it was purely commercial.

They also argued that ICT's appeal was moot as the prospecting right granted to it had lapsed.

The two were asking that the matter be dismissed with costs.


We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.93
-0.1%
Rand - Pound
23.90
-0.0%
Rand - Euro
20.44
+0.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.34
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.1%
Platinum
906.59
+1.1%
Palladium
1,012.66
+1.1%
Gold
2,221.84
+1.2%
Silver
24.88
+1.0%
Brent Crude
86.09
-0.2%
Top 40
68,346
+1.0%
All Share
74,536
+0.9%
Resource 10
57,251
+2.9%
Industrial 25
103,936
+0.6%
Financial 15
16,502
-0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders