Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

Joburg property rates 'unlawful'

Nov 08 2012 16:44 Sapa

Related Articles

Joburg says no to billing queries

Joburg official axed over kickbacks

DA: ANC wants Joburg secrecy bill

Joburg Metro tackles billing crisis

Joburg denies inflating rates

Joburg rates fraud more than R10m

 
Bloemfontein - The City of Johannesburg unlawfully increased rates on businesses, commercial and industrial properties in 2009/2010, the Supreme Court of Appeal held on Thursday.

It delivered judgment in an appeal by the SA Property Owners' Association (Sapoa) against an earlier finding for the municipality.

The SCA found the Johannesburg council and mayor had not complied with relevant provisions of:

- the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act;

- the Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act;

- and the Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act.

All three acts make provision for community participation.

At the time, the municipality decided to increase the rates on business, commercial and industrial properties by 28 percent. This came after the budget providing for an increase of 10 percent had been tabled and advertised for public comment.

The High Court in Johannesburg found for the city, and held the levying of property rates was not an integral part of the budget process.

The lower court found granting the relief sought by Sapoa was not in the public interest, because it would probably bankrupt the city, leaving it unable to perform its constitutional duties. The association’s application was dismissed with costs.

The SCA held the decision to impose the additional 18 percent was irrational and unfairly discriminated against the owners of such properties. The SCA upheld the association's appeal against the High Court order.

However, a majority judgment of the SCA decided the problem created by the rates unlawfully levied could not be solved by a court order. This decision was in terms of the Constitution, which requires that the SCA make a just and equitable order.

The SCA therefore declared the council had acted unlawfully in imposing the contentious rate, and stated how such a problem had to be dealt with in future.

The judgment declared the relevant provisions of the acts should be complied with when the council wished to adopt a budget with rates which were materially different from those in the tabled budget.
sca  |  supreme court of appeal
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
27 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

A cash flow crunch often occurs in small businesses trying to balance cash coming in with cash going out. Watch this video to help you improve.
 
 

Passive investment for retirement

The use of passive investment products, like Exchange Traded Funds, to deliver low-cost investment performance is taking off.

 
 

Start saving...

Time the key for retirement saving
Dummy's guide to saving
Save money with affordable account
All about endowments

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...