• Busting Uber myths

    The ehailing firm is constantly trying, succeeding - and sometimes failing, says Ian Mann.

  • Trapped in a democracy

    The very people elected to bring benefits to all are undermining SA, says Solly Moeng.

  • Marikana spectre

    Five years after the bloody massacre calls for justice are growing louder, says Terry Bell.


India's revised growth data, raises fears

Aug 30 2012 19:26

New Delhi - India has quietly revised a slew of key economic data ahead of new GDP figures due out on Friday, a move economists say raises questions about the reliability of the country's financial records.

India's Central Statistics Office (CSO) has a history of making frequent revisions, but seasoned experts have been startled by the scale of the latest changes, which were released unannounced on the Internet.

Among the most significant alterations, the CSO sharply downgraded growth in the last quarter of the financial year to March 2009 from 5.9% to 3.5%.

"That big revision more than three years after the event doesn't leave one with great confidence in the quality of these numbers," Credit Suisse economist Robert Prior-Wandesforde told AFP on Thursday.

"This also adds an extra degree of uncertainty for policymakers," he said.

When the government released its latest quarterly figures, from January to March this year, showing expansion of 5.3%, it made headlines for showing the slowest pace of quarterly growth in nine years.

Now, according to the revised figures, that pace of growth is the weakest in just three years.

The revisions markedly change India's growth performance during and after the last global financial crisis, with expansion proving to be slower during the worst phase of the downturn and showing a sharper recovery.

Growth in the January to March 2010 quarter during the recovery phase was revised to a hefty 11.2% from 8.6%.

Senior CSO department official T. Rajeshwari told AFP the revisions did not result from any error but rather reflected a new calculation of industrial output - an important component of GDP figures.

"We had to rework the whole series as it was inappropriate to compare the new series (of growth data) with the old data," Rajeshwari said.

Another government official, who declined to be named, conceded the revisions were "quite drastic".

Figures for the latest financial quarter to June are expected to show growth of 5.2 to 5.3% with the economy still hurting from high interest rates, weak investor confidence and policymaking paralysis.

This week's big revisions are the latest in a string.

India's January industrial output growth was cut to 1.1% from an initial 6.8% estimate - a correction the CSO blamed on a miscalculation in sugar production.

Then finance minister Pranab Mukherjee described the change that dashed hopes the economy was picking up steam as "totally baffling".

Economists said they did not believe the data revisions reflected any political interference, saying if that were the case India's economic indicators would be much better overall.

Rather, one economist, who did not wish to be named, said he felt the changes reflected "incompetence".

"What's the point of taking any (policy) decisions based on this kind of data?" asked Manas Chakravarty, a columnist at India's Mint financial newspaper.

*Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook and Google+.

credit suisse  |  pranab mukherjee  |  india  |  finance



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

We're Talking About...

Savings Month

It's never too late to start saving. Visit our special issue and add your voice.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

The proposal to nationalise SARB will

Previous results · Suggest a vote