• SABC shenanigans

    SA has already embarked on a slippery slope to autocracy, warns Terry Bell in Inside Labour.

  • Zim tastes people power

    Protests in Zimbabwe are forcing Mugabe to face anti-government sentiment, says Memory Mataranyika.

  • Platinum handshake

    Officials who try to do what's right risk far more than blessed wrongdoers, says Solly Moeng.

All data is delayed
See More

Graft body: Charge construction colluders

Jul 18 2013 07:43

Johannesburg - Criminal charges must be laid against directors of construction companies who were collectively fined R1.46bn for collusion, Corruption Watch said on Wednesday.

"[We]..call on the relevant prosecuting authorities to lay criminal charges against those individuals who have contravened the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act [Precca]," it said.

Corruption Watch made a submission to the Competition Tribunal on Wednesday at a hearing into the settlement agreement faced by 15 construction firms which rigged bids for 2010 Soccer World Cup infrastructure projects and other projects.

On June 24 the Competition Commission reached a settlement with 15 construction firms for collusive tendering in contravention of the Competition Act.

On Wednesday, Corruption Watch called on those affected by the collusive tendering, including municipalities, provinces and private entities to institute civil claims for damages suffered.

It said the collusion, which was prohibited by the Competition Act amounted to corruption.

"Thus where firms, through their employees and directors, participate in a bid-rigging cartel and engage in cover pricing to favour one or more firms in exchange for, for example a 'loser’s fee', this amounts, in Corruption Watch’s view, to an offence under Precca," it said

"Those individuals who participated in this corrupt activity can and should be charged with this criminal offence, to which criminal sanctions, including imprisonment, attach."

Corruption Watch also called on shareholders - particularly pension fund trustees and public financial institutions such as the Public Investment Corporation - to take legal action against directors who had been or should have been aware of the collusion.

It also called on the companies to "claw back" bonuses awarded to individuals implicated in the cartel.

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


Saving can make a lot of things possible, but we all know how hard it is to save. This special Savings Issue will help you get focused.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Sarb's decision to keep the repo rate unchanged is:

Previous results · Suggest a vote