• Busting Uber myths

    The ehailing firm is constantly trying, succeeding - and sometimes failing, says Ian Mann.

  • Trapped in a democracy

    The very people elected to bring benefits to all are undermining SA, says Solly Moeng.

  • Marikana spectre

    Five years after the bloody massacre calls for justice are growing louder, says Terry Bell.

Loading...

Were Eskom cleaning contracts rigged?

Aug 06 2017 07:42
Lesetja Malope

Johannesburg - Contracts worth millions of rands awarded by power utility Eskom in KwaZulu-Natal have been questioned by insiders and losing bidders.

A total of 13 companies contested the cleaning and facilities management contracts, but only two of them were chosen for R64.2 million work.

However, Eskom, in an unusual turn of events and against professional advice, increased the price of the contracts by R13.2 million to R77.4 million.

This is what Eskom allegedly did when a tender committee led by its general manager in KwaZulu-Natal, Monde Bala, allegedly flouted several regulations to hand the contract to Mfesi Cleaning Services and Total Serve Facilities Management.

According to documents seen by City Press, the committee overlooked several regulations to award the tender to Mfesi and disregarded a professional quantity surveyor’s opinion, which recommended against the continuation of the Mfesi contracts for three sites, including at Eskom’s Empangeni and Pietermaritzburg offices.

Mfesi’s contract was valued at R60.1 million, up from R50.2 million, while Total Serve’s contract was upped from R14 million to R17.3 million.

Among the services listed to be provided at the different sites are cleaning, laundry and removal of front-line services.

The recommendation only fingered Mfesi’s contract – not both companies’.

“Mfesi can either continue with the price as per the contract signed or terminate and follow the correct contract management process.

"Eskom can choose to reissue this contract at a common base schedule or continue to use as per legal advice, pending clarification of the tendered rates.

"Bearing in mind there might be legal repercussions from the unsuccessful tenders,” the recommendation reads.

Bala denied seeing any report that recommended that the contract be continued at the initial price or cancelled, and instead said the company’s own internal legal adviser, which reported to him, said they should continue with the tender.

Among the findings in the same report were that the pricing structure used was incorrect, and that the bill of quantities (BoQ) submitted to the quantity surveyor was not the same one submitted in the tender document and showed a number of discrepancies.

The report further states that:

“Had the negotiations and the clarification meeting been carried out, the contract would not have been awarded due to the inconsistency and errors in the BoQ and the new engineering contract.”

The tender was adjusted two months into the 36-month contract in March this year.

The Eskom modification report gives six reasons why the price of the contracts were hiked, including extra work, services not required, items that weren’t originally tendered for and were now included, an ambiguous price list and adjustments for overheads.

Mfesi Cleaning Services’ sole director, Jannet Dube, declined to comment.

The sole director of Total Serve, Thandeka Ndlovu, said the adjustment was because of overheads that were not included in the initial tender and when asked why that was so, she referred the matter to Eskom.

Eskom spokesperson Khulu Phasiwe said: “Contracts are adjusted in line with Eskom’s procurement and supply chain management policy.

"The adjustments were made to ensure compliance with statutory obligations by both parties, hence Eskom cannot disclose confidential information with its supplier,” he said.

Asked why the recommendation was ignored, Phasiwe said Eskom considered various options to minimise risk.

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATE: Get Fin24's top morning business news and opinions in your inbox.

Read Fin24's top stories trending on Twitter:

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're Talking About...

Savings Month

It's never too late to start saving. Visit our special issue and add your voice.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

The proposal to nationalise SARB will

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...