• 10 tips to find bargains

    Susan Erasmus gives advice on how bargain hunters can get the most bang for their buck.

  • Inside Labour

    Labour's bitter breaches need to be seen in historical context, says Terry Bell.

  • Rich getting richer

    Economists differ on how to tackle the chasm between rich and poor, says Leopold Scholtz.

Loading...
See More

E-toll judgment reserved

Nov 28 2012 17:08 Sapa

Related Articles

Lawyer: Outa case based on a sham

E-toll arguments continue

Lawyer: Outcry over tariffs, not tolls

Sanral lawyer: Toll costs were known

Sanral hits back over e-toll notice

Lawyer: Dismiss e-toll application

Tolls

 
Pretoria - Gauteng motorists will only know later what the fate of the Gauteng e-tolling system will be, after the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria reserved judgment on the matter on Wednesday.

"I don't have to say this, but judgment is reserved," Judge Louis Vorster said.

"I don't want to keep the public waiting and will be as expeditious as possible, but I don't want to tie myself down to a specific date."

The Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance (Outa) wanted the court to review and set aside the SA National Roads Agency Limited's (Sanral) decision to declare sections of Gauteng's freeways as toll roads.

Outa accused Sanral of having deliberately kept the public in the dark and being dishonest about the implementation of tolls in Gauteng.

David Unterhalter SC, for Sanral, rejected the claim as reckless. Outa had to look at the facts of the case and the affidavits submitted by Sanral, the transport department and Treasury. Outa should present facts to back up its "extraordinary deception".

"There are no facts that support the claim of dishonesty," Unterhalter argued.

"It [the claim] is reckless, it is gratuitous... To raise dishonesty in this way is to colour the facts a certain way."

The allegation that Sanral had "cut corners" to meet the 2010 Soccer World Cup deadline was not true.

Outa lawyer Mike Maritz argued that e-tolling should be set aside because there had been no thorough public consultation.

"E-tolling should be set aside until Sanral can come up with a proper proposal that can work, and then invite the public to comment," Maritz said in his closing argument.

During the three days, Sanral, the transport department and Treasury had argued that the application should be dismissed.

Maritz said responses to his submission were sarcastic.

Jeremy Gauntlett SC, for the Treasury, argued that Outa's application was based on a sham.

"The sham is vital to their new case. They argue that they should be excused for their delay."

Gauntlett echoed arguments made on Tuesday by Unterhalter that all relevant civil society organisations representing Gauteng motorists had known about e-tolling and the user-pays principle, but had done nothing until the tariffs were introduced.

Unterhalter said these organisations stood by for years while construction was in progress.

On Wednesday, Gauntlett argued that civil society waited until after roadworks had been completed to raise objections.

"Civil society is a watchdog, but it must get out of the kennel and bark," he said.

"[The application] is their attempt to delay the inevitable."

He said Outa had gone to court without a properly-argued case.

Maritz said Sanral had had "no real intention" to hold proper public consultations.

Vincent Maleka SC, for the transport department, told the court roads in Gauteng had been upgraded, that the public had supported the upgrades and that it could not be reversed.

On Tuesday morning, Unterhalter contended that Outa changed its submissions in September after the Constitutional Court overturned an interim order putting the Gauteng e-tolling project on hold.

The Constitutional Court found the High Court in Pretoria had not considered the separation of powers between the high court and the executive.

On April 28, the high court granted the interdict to Outa, ruling that a full review needed to be carried out before e-tolling could be put into effect.

The interdict prevented Sanral from levying or collecting e-tolls pending the outcome of the review.
outa  |  sanral  |  e-tolls  |  tolls

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
31 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

Brought to you by BizNews

More from BizNews

We're talking about:

SMALL BUSINESS

Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.
 
 

10 most expensive cars In the world

This is car porn at its best!

 
 

Luxury living

Seven of the most expensive children's toys ever made
5 millionaires turned murderers
The youngest billionaires in the world and how they made it
Watch: Flying first class has never been this luxurious!

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

How do you see your boss? He/sheis:

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...