Loading...
See More

Distasteful or criminal?

Apr 18 2013 12:07 *Altair Richards


Related Articles

Cosatu slams retailers over meat scandal

Supermarkets in meat scandal named

Supermarkets respond to meat report

Act on 'cowboys' in food industry - body

Tougher meat labelling laws on cards

Contaminated meat suppliers face jail

 
FOOD labelling has been in the spotlight following the European horsemeat scandal and the findings of a recent study by the University of Stellenbosch, where undeclared ingredients were found in a number of meat products in South Africa.

An article released by City Press on Sunday sought to “name and shame” several major retailers who allegedly failed to fully disclose the ingredients in some of their meat products.

In response to these allegations, several industry players have responded by stating that unavoidable cross-contamination is to blame and that the products are nonetheless fit for human consumption.

Many consumers have voiced their concerns regarding the mislabelling of meat products and its implications, which span health, economic, religious and ethical spheres.

The Congress of South African Trade Unions and the Food and Allied Workers Union have voiced their concern at prominent retailers’ apparent disdain for the rights of South African consumers.

Although these concerns are of course valid and deserving of consideration, manufacturers, retailers and consumers should also be aware that the sale of mislabelled foodstuffs is unlawful under South African legislation.

In terms of the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act (Foodstuffs Act), it is a criminal offence to describe, for purposes of sale, any foodstuff in a manner which is false or misleading as regards the foodstuff’s origin, nature, substance, composition, quality, strength, nutritive value or other properties.

This includes instances where a person sells or imports (with the intention of selling) a foodstuff.

In terms of the Foodstuffs Act and its regulations, subject to very limited exclusions, it is also an offence to manufacture, import, sell or offer any pre-packaged foodstuff without a complete list of ingredients, including all additives.

In addition, the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) provides that a retailer of goods must not supply any goods if the retailer knows or reasonably suspects that a trade description has been applied to the goods which is likely to mislead the consumer, as to any matter implied or expressed in that trade description.

Section 41 of the CPA further prohibits false, misleading or deceptive representations. I

n terms of the CPA it would be a false, misleading or deceptive representation to falsely state or imply, or fail to correct an apparent misapprehension on the part of a consumer to the effect, that any goods have ingredients or qualities that they do not have.

A recent notice published by the department of trade and industry for public comment provides for certain categories of goods which are required to have a trade description applied in terms of the CPA.

Included are processed and packaged meat products, as well as dried and packaged meat products.

The information required in the trade description applied to these products will include the ingredients of which the goods consist, as well as the quality of the goods. 

Strictly speaking, importers, manufacturers, distributors and retailers who sell mislabelled food products in South Africa are committing an offence under the Foodstuffs Act and may be conducting themselves in contravention of the CPA.

So what does this mean for companies in the food supply chain? 

As mentioned above, non-compliance with the Foodstuffs Act is a criminal offence. A first offence is punishable on conviction by a fine of up to R20 000 and/or imprisonment for up to six months.

For multiple convictions, the maximum fine increases to R80 000 and/or two years' imprisonment.

From a CPA perspective, a contravention of the relevant provisions may be regarded as a violation of a consumer’s right to fair and honest dealing.

Recent reports indicate that Minister of Trade and Industry Rob Davies has requested the National Consumer Commission to launch an investigation into meat labelling. 

Where a consumer’s rights under the CPA have been infringed, consumers or a group of consumers may approach the National Consumer Commission, the National Consumer Tribunal or the court to seek any relief which may be provided for in the CPA.

In principle, a group of consumers could bring a class action where their consumer rights have been violated by incorrect labelling. 

Importers, manufacturers, distributors and retailers of food products should be aware of the extent of their obligations and potential liability in respect of product labelling under the applicable legislation.

Consumers should also be aware of their right to fair and honest dealing and to truthful information about the foods they buy and consume.

 - Fin24

*Altair Richards is an executive at Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs and specialises in healthcare and pharmaceutical law, the food and pet food industries, as well as food and advertising law.
 

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

meat scandal
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

Retailers of any shape and size can now unlock the power of mobile transacting.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...