• Thinking strategically

    Do policymakers actually consider improving trade performance, asks Geoffrey Chapman.

  • Power problems

    It's an iron law: no electricity, no modern economy, says Leopold Scholtz.

  • M2M money train

    SA's biggest mobile operators have found a new revenue stream, says Gugu Lourie.

Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

Buy e-tags, urges Sanral

Dec 13 2012 12:13 Sapa

Sanral CEO Nazir Alli

Related Articles

Court rules in favour of e-tolls

Govt cars to register for e-tolling

Duvenhage: Outa's challenge excellent

Lawyer: Outa case based on a sham

Lawyer: Outcry over tariffs, not tolls

D-day for e-tolls judgment

 

Pretoria - E-tolling of Gauteng freeways got the legal nod on Thursday when the North Gauteng High Court dismissed an application to have the project scrapped. 

"The application is dismissed," Judge Louis Vorster said, reading out his judgment. 

"In my view the application cannot succeed." 

Vorster ruled that the Opposition to Urban Tolling Alliance, as the applicant, should pay the costs of the SA national Roads Agency limited (Sanral), the transport department, National Treasury, the MEC of roads and transport in Gauteng, minister of water and environmental affairs and the director general of the department. 

"The applicants are ordered to pay jointly and severally the costs reserved by the Constitutional Court to the respondents who participated in that appeal before the Constitutional Court." 

He said the costs order included the cost of counsel. 

Buy e-tags

After the judgment, Sanral CEO Nazir Alli was seen hugging his colleagues. He said he was pleased with the outcome. 

"We are not here to crook, we are not going to be shedding any kind of crocodile tears or anything of that sort," he told reporters. 

"We are here to implement government policy. I would like all of us to turn around and respect the decision of the courts. 

"It is unfortunate that Outa showed total disregard and disrespect for the decision of the Constitutional Court." 

He appealed to the media to report "correctly and truthfully" on the e-toll matter, saying there had been untruths, lies and half-truths published against Sanral. 

Alli urged people to buy e-tags. 

Outa chairperson Wayne Duvenhage shook his head after Voster made his judgment. 

"I think today's judgment represents a sad day for South Africa's democracy as it demonstrates government's ability to railroad public engagement policy and thereby make decisions that are not in the best interest of society," he said. 

"The outcome also sends a clear message about the lack of importance of citizens' input, and will have an input in society's feeling powerless against the state, and its bulldozer tactics in driving its own agendas and policies." 

He said the decision would have an impact on South Africa's global image. 

Outa was never opposed to society paying for infrastructure upgrades, Duvenhage said. 

Outa believed Sanral would never be ready to launch e-tolling. 

"We sincerely ask Sanral and government to reconsider their decision to toll our urban freeways," Duvenhage said. 

"We now call on Gauteng motorists to not purchase e-tags, as legally they are not obliged to do so." 

Duvenhage said his legal team would study the judgment before deciding the way forward. 

Director-general George Mahlalela said it was unclear when e-tolling would begin, saying the minister would make an announcement. 

"We are pleased with the judgment, we think that it closes a chapter and gives us an opportunity to move forward," he said. 

"The minister will very soon announce, after all the submissions were made, the way forward. We are still working on the details." 

Vorster found that the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project scheme was done lawfully.

In September, the Constitutional Court overturned an interim order putting the Gauteng e-tolling project on hold. 

The Constitutional Court found the North Gauteng High Court had not considered the separation of powers between the high court and the executive. 

On April 28, the high court granted the interdict to Outa, ruling that a full review needed to be carried out before e-tolling could be put into effect. 

The interdict prevented Sanral from levying or collecting e-tolls pending the outcome of the review.

 

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
339 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

Expanding your business requires capital and banks have stringent lending criteria in place.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...