• Free market fallacies

    Higher income benefits could be trickling up instead of down, says Leopold Scholtz.

  • What awaits Greece?

    Julien Marcilly takes a look at what may transpire after the Greek referendum.

  • A loss of respect

    Can SA still attract the best as our leaders take questionable decisions, asks Solly Moeng.

See More

Bread class action bid gets new life

Nov 29 2012 15:02

Related Articles

Joburg property rates 'unlawful'

Blow for former SAA boss

Court questions SAA ex-CEO's appeal

Smokers' rights in ashes

US top court rejects Enron man's appeal

Court finds for Competition Commission

Bloemfontein - An application for a class action against three Western Cape bread makers -- Pioneer Foods, Premier Foods, and Tiger Consumer Brands -- was referred back to the High Court by the Supreme Court of Appeal on Thursday.

The case was brought by a number of NGOs and five individuals against the bread bakers. The matter relates to the Competition Tribunal fining Tiger Brands, Pioneer Foods, and Premier Foods for their involvement in bread price fixing.

The SCA judgment referred the matter back to the Western Cape High Court, but also laid down requirements for such an action.

In order to launch a class action lawsuit, parties seeking redress must obtain a certificate of a class action from the High Court.

In this matter the Children's Resource Centre, the Black Sash Trust, the Congress of SA Trade Unions, and the National Consumer Forum brought an application for a class certification order.

This was on behalf of consumers allegedly harmed by the anti-competitive conduct of the bread makers.

The initial certification application was dismissed on the grounds that the aggrieved parties had failed to make out a case for a sufficiently identifiable class of persons.

On readmitting the case in the High Court, the SCA said the issue of certification had to be determined on complete papers.

It had to include draft particulars of the claim and affidavits indicating that there was a prima facie case on the merits.

The SCA held the application had been dealt with as matter of urgency, and as a result the bread makers had not been able to put their full case before the court.

It was held that the case of the appellants -- the NGOs and individuals -- had also changed during the cause of the litigation.

The court found the proposed class action was also overly broad and the relief it sought inappropriate.

However, the SCA held the group's claim was potentially plausible, and with the court laying down the requirements for a class action, it was appropriate to afford them an opportunity to correct the flaws in the court papers in line with the new requirements.

The case could then continue in the High Court with the requirements laid down by the SCA on Thursday.


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


There are no formal training requirements for becoming a beautician in South Africa. But it is highly recommended you complete a course in beauty therapy.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

SA’s new visa regulations are:

Previous results · Suggest a vote