• Inside Labour

    Without radical policy change SA's social fabric will continue to fray, says Terry Bell.

  • Long live your gadget

    Real gadget protection tends to cost real money, writes Arthur Goldstuck.

  • Taking SA for a ride

    The ANC seems to think all South Africans are idiots, says Mzwandile Jacks.

Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

July deadline for tax advisers

Jan 08 2013 16:01 Byron Messaris
tax


Related Articles

Laws to protect taxpayers

Tax returns hit record

Sars official to chair global tax forum

Sars to tackle construction tax fraud

Sars to clamp down on tax dodgers

Sars: Large companies avoiding tax in SA

 
Cape Town – Tax practitioners who provide taxpayers with advice or complete tax returns for a fee have until July 1 2013 to find a home with a controlling body if they want to be recognised under the new Tax Administration Act.

They also have to be registered with the South African Revenue Service (Sars) by July 1 this year, in terms of the act which came into effect in October 2012.

Those who fail to do so will face legal action.

This will shield taxpayers from unprofessional conduct by tax practitioners which could potentially place both their funds and reputation at risk, said Sars spokesperson Adrian Lackay.

The new regulations aim to hold tax practitioners accountable for the advice they give to taxpayers, and also to rid the industry of rogue practitioners.

The act requires tax practitioners to register with controlling bodies such as the Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors, the South Africa Institute for Chartered Accountants (Saica) and the Institute of Professional Accountants and the Institute for Tax Practitioners (Sait) among others.

It also gives more teeth to these bodies, allowing them to take disciplinary action against practitioners who contravene the controlling body’s rules of conduct.

The new legislation also addresses minimum professional qualifications and continuing professional education requirements to be fulfilled by tax practitioners, said Deborah Tickle, director of international corporate tax at KPMG.

Controlling bodies can now enforce minimum qualifications and continuing educational requirements, ensuring that the taxpaying public is no longer at the mercy of practitioners who are not up to speed with the latest developments, said Tickle.

Lackay said taxpayers will now have the comfort of knowing that their tax advisers meet minimum standards, undertake continuing professional education and are subject to a disciplinary code.

“The negative is that highly experienced and qualified tax practitioners may not be able to practise legally unless they comply with the requirements of a controlling body to which they are required to belong.

“Some taxpayers may suddenly find they can no longer use the tax practitioners they have used and been comfortable with for many years,” said Tickle.

Saica welcomed the legislation, saying it believes the tax profession should be regulated.

“Saica was not in favour of a statutory regulator that would regulate and provide services to tax practitioners,” said Piet Nel, Saica’s project director for tax.

“In a round table meeting on regulation in 2009, Saica along with Saipa, Sait and the Law Society of South Africa agreed that an accreditation model for professional bodies, such as those found in the law fraternity, were a better alternative than a statutory regulator.”

For Sars an unregulated industry meant spending a great deal of time and energy in correcting errors caused by the unprofessional conduct of a small but significant number of tax practitioners, according to Lackay.

Lackay said Sars is engaged in a number of initiatives aimed at improving the compliance culture and reducing the tax gap in South Africa.

“It is proposed that the regulation of tax practitioners be divided into two phases. The first phase will be the compulsory registration of tax practitioners with a recognised controlling body.

“The second phase will be the establishment of an independent regulatory board for tax practitioners." This will start with a review of the first phase 18 months after its implementation, said Lackay.

 - Fin24

Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

tax
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
4 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

“Hippie sense makes business sense,” an entrepreneur said, adding that "purpose" was core to success.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...