Fin24

ANC denies claim on Swazi loan

2012-08-30 16:59

Cape Town - ANC chief whip Mathole Motshekga has denied that the ANC in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) endorsed a call on the government to hold back on a loan to Swaziland.

The claim by Democratic Alliance MP Alf Lees was a "shameless lie and a deliberate distortion of the facts", he said in a statement on Thursday.

"Neither the ANC nor the NCOP have expressed support for DA MP Alf Lees's motion. Either Lees... is clueless about the functioning of the NCOP in relation to the party motions, or is just plain naive," he said.
 
On Wednesday, Lees issued a statement welcoming the ANC's support in the NCOP for his motion without notice calling on the government to hold back payment of the R1.4bn bailout to Swaziland.
 
"I asked the House to note that King Mswati III of Swaziland - one of the few remaining absolute monarchs in the world - continues to refuse to allow a democratic dispensation and lives an excessively lavish lifestyle while his people live in poverty."
 
He also asked the House to call on the government to refuse financial assistance to Swaziland until certain conditions were met.
 
These included scrapping the 39-year-old state of emergency, implementing universal human rights, ensuring none of the loan funds be spent on the monarchy, immediate implementing a multi-party transitional government, and immediately starting multi-party negotiations towards a new democratic constitution for Swaziland, Lees said.
 
Motions without notice follow after the usual notices of motion by members, which do not have to be agreed to by the House.
 
If any party objects to a motion without notice, it becomes a normal notice of motion and is recorded as such.
 
However, according to the minutes of proceedings in the NCOP on August 28, Lees's motion without notice was put to the House by the presiding officer and was agreed to by the House unopposed.
 
However, in his statement on Thursday, Motshekga said "members' motions in the NCOP were equivalent to political party statements".
 
"They represent views of political parties and do not need to be endorsed by other parties or accepted as resolutions of the House.
 
"It is nothing short of a brazen delusion for one to believe that a member's motion automatically enjoys the support of the majority party and qualifies as a resolution of the House as soon as it is presented," he said.
 
The ANC's position with regard to the loan to Swaziland remained unchanged.
 
The bailout was based on conditions that the government of Swaziland undertook reform measures guided by the Joint Bilateral Commissions for Co-operation (JBBC) agreement," Motshekga said.
 
In his statement on Wednesday, Lees said Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan had recently stated that the loan, which is governed by a Memorandum of Understanding, was subject to certain fiscal and political conditions.
 
The first tranche of the loan was scheduled for payment in September 2012, despite the political situation in Swaziland remaining questionable.
 
"I will be writing to the minister of finance... asking that, in accordance with the motion passed in Parliament, that this process is put on hold until the above conditions are met," he said.

*Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook and Google+.

Comments
  • squeegee.pilot - 2012-08-30 17:10

    "We want our kickbacks!" ANC.

  • michael.rampatla - 2012-08-30 17:10

    I don't trust anything that comes from this surname Motshega they are both liars

  • hasani.malungana - 2012-08-30 17:15

    I also need a bail out, wow

  • Stockton.John - 2012-08-30 17:25

    '...scrapping the 39-year-old state of emergency, implementing universal human rights, ensuring none of the loan funds be spent on the monarchy, immediate implementing a multi-party transitional government, and immediately starting multi-party negotiations towards a new democratic constitution for Swaziland..." ANC doesn't care... kickbacks only count... Mandela I hope you have given up reading papers... You spent all the years in jail to ensure the country enjoys freedom... but the government now just want the money... It's a pity they have forgotten what you and all the others went to prison for...

  • larry.piggott1 - 2012-08-30 17:41

    ANC and Deny, in the same headline. Why am I not surprised?

  • glen.e.huysamer - 2012-08-30 18:01

    There is so much motion happening here that it sounds like the ANC/government including parliament is over their heads in cr*p, what the heck is South Africa giving loans to Swaziland for, how are they (the people of Swaziland) expected to pay it back. The people of Swaziland will not see a dime of this money, and why then should South Africa's be out of pocket, for a lone that can not possibly be paid back, and will not help what-so-ever in alleviating the dire poverty i which Swaziland's people find themselves in. The ANC is in motion once again to line their own pockets with hefty kick-backs in an orchestrated theft of South Africa's public money, while also complacent in bolstering and supporting a total monarchy which believes it owns the people of Swaziland as if they are slaves. South AFrica should not lend a dime until free and fare elections are held in Swaziland ensuring that it becomes a democracy by the people for the people.

  • terrylee.heuer - 2012-08-30 18:08

    In a further story regarding Transnet and Swaziland's rail deal it said Govt did offer them a loan but they turned it down!!

  • Zahir - 2012-08-30 18:16

    Why must the SA taxpayer fund this king and his dozen wives? Swaziland king will keep on begging Zooma for more cash from us

  • pages:
  • 1