Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Ratings: New rules mooted

Sep 18 2009 08:57

Related Articles

Wall Street's up to old tricks

No love for Fed in US

S&P cuts ratings on 22 banks

Fitch warns SA firms

S&P downgrades British economy

Fears over Resbank, Treasury

 

Top Stories

Gauteng road project costs rocket

May 25 2012 13:58

The costs of the first phase of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project have increased significantly to almost R90bn, according to a report.

Greek euro worries pressures rand

May 25 2012 19:13

Uncertainty over the future of the euro zone returned to push the rand down against the dollar.

JSE halts 'incorrect' trade

May 25 2012 11:36

The JSE has identified and stopped "incorrect" trades from one of its members, and will reverse the trades and lower the session's total value after the close.

 
Share Share line Print

Washington - Federal regulators on Thursday proposed new rules designed to stem conflicts of interest and provide more transparency for Wall Street's credit rating industry, which was widely faulted for its role in the subprime mortgage debacle and the financial crisis.

The five members of the Securities and Exchange Commission voted at a public meeting to propose rules that could reshape an industry dominated by three firms: Standard & Poor's, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings. Their practices would be opened wider to public view and subject to some restraints.

Regulators say they also hope to spur more competition in the rating industry, with new entrants challenging the dominant firms.

The proposed rules, which were opened to public comment, could eventually be adopted by the agency, possibly with revisions.

The SEC commissioners also proposed a ban on "flash orders" - a practice that gives some traders a split-second advantage in buying or selling stocks. It has become a hot-button issue in recent weeks amid questions about transparency and fairness on Wall Street.

Nasdaq OMX Group Inc, which operates the Nasdaq Stock Market, and the BATS exchange have voluntarily stopped using flash orders, which made up an estimated 3% of stock trading. The New York Stock Exchange has never used them.

The credit rating agencies have been widely criticised for failing to identify risks in securities backed by subprime mortgages. They had to downgrade thousands of the securities last year as home-loan delinquencies soared and the value of those investments plummeted. The downgrades contributed to hundreds of billions in losses and writedowns at big banks and investment firms.

One SEC proposal discussed Thursday is intended to bar companies from "shopping" for favorable ratings of their securities.

"These proposals are needed because investors often consider ratings when evaluating whether to purchase or sell a particular security," SEC chairperson Mary Schapiro said before the vote. "That reliance did not serve them well over the last several years, and it is incumbent upon us to do all that we can to improve the reliability and integrity of the ratings process."

The SEC commissioners took their action during a week when memories of the collapse of Lehman Brothers a year ago were fresh in Washington.

"There is general consensus that the rating agencies contributed significantly to the damage and the widespread loss of confidence," said Commissioner Luis Aguilar.

In July, Senator Charles Schumer called on the SEC to ban flash orders, threatening legislation if it failed to act.

"This proposal will once and for all get rid of flash trading, which if left untouched, could seriously undermine the fairness and transparency of our markets," Schumer said in a statement Thursday.

In California, Attorney General Jerry Brown launched an investigation into the three big agencies to determine what role they might have played in the collapse of the financial markets. Brown said he had subpoenaed the three firms to determine whether they violated state law in "recklessly giving stellar ratings to shaky assets."

Word of the probe came after the California Public Employees' Retirement System sued the agencies, blaming them for more than $1bn in investment losses.

- AP

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
Facebook's intrinsic value
May 23 2012 11:32

When it comes to judging a company’s worth, value investors like Warren Buffett look at intrinsic value. By that measure, Facebook’s shares are worth less than $10. A Reuters analyst breaks down the math. (Reuters)

NicolaaSmith

CIPPA equals automatic zero erosion in the constant item economy We do not have stable – as in fixed real value – money. The real value of money is generally accepted by the public at large to be stable – as in fixed – in low inflation economies, but this is not true. The be... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...