Santiago/London - Standing in the cavernous tunnel of what
promises to become one of the world's biggest copper mines, it's easy to see
why Chile's state mining colossus Codelco covets its neighbour - and why it
could be humiliated by its botched attempt to buy a big stake.
Codelco has long hoped to take a stake in Anglo American
[JSE:AGL] Los Bronces mine, which sits tantalisingly close to Codelco's Andina
division in the Andes mountains just outside Santiago. Separated by a narrow
wall of rock, in geological terms the two deposits are effectively one giant
mine rich in copper.
But the deal has run aground after Codelco took the wrong
strategy in negotiations and made a schoolboy error in underestimating an
industry rival, assuming the latter would not risk upsetting its standing in
Chile by selling a stake from under the state juggernaut.
Codelco was caught off-guard when Anglo American
preemptively sold half of the 49% stake that in January Codelco would have been
eligible to buy in Anglo's southern Chilean properties, which include Los
Bronces, to Japan's Mitsubishi Corp.
Los Bronces aims to be the world's fifth-biggest copper mine
and is a rarity in a market that has been defined in recent years by a lack of
significant new deposits.
It would have been a multi-billion-dollar windfall for
Codelco and the snafu is an embarrassment for deeply unpopular conservative
President Sebastian Pinera, a self-made billionaire who is trying to run state
enterprises like a private-sector business.
Chile is the world's No.1 copper producer, mining a third of
global supply, and the metal is by far the biggest export and a top revenue
earner in Latin America's most stable economy.
Codelco insists the long-standing option contract with Anglo
puts the Chilean company on solid ground, although much will depend on how the
courts interpret the pact.
Codelco maintains its option gives it the right to buy a 49%
stake in Anglo American's southern Chilean properties, known as Anglo American
Sur. Anglo says the contract gave it the right to sell a stake to Mitsubishi,
because Codelco's window to exercise its option opens only in January.
"There are different interpretations of a contract ...
But we're fairly certain that ours is the right one," Codelco CEO Diego
Hernandez told Reuters after a bitter, public war of words with Anglo American.
Hernandez was furious when Anglo's deal with Mitsubishi was
announced, cutting short a trip to a forum in Hawaii as he launched an
offensive.
Legal experts say the wording of the option contract favours
Anglo's case, although Chile's legal system gives significant weight to the
"spirit" of legal pacts. Tapping a vein of nationalist sentiment amid
the dispute, Hernandez was quick to warn that the contract was made under
Chilean law.
Still, experts say Codelco may have put too much trust in
the nebulous legal principle of "good faith".
Codelco has changed its rhetoric to stress it wants to
defend the "value" of its option, and Anglo officials acknowledge
some shareholders are concerned, suggesting the mining titans could settle. But
the two sides and their legions of lawyers appear more likely to go into an
extended legal battle.
Anglo American said on Thursday it was suing Codelco for
breach of contract and said it wanted to void Codelco's option altogether, deepening
the rift. Legal experts said the move could stymie Codelco from exercising its
option during its January window, while the issue is in court.
Codelco gamble
Codelco surprised markets in October by saying it had
secured a $6.75bn bridging loan from Japan's Mitsui & Co enabling it to
exercise the option during a stipulated 30-day window in January at a price
well below current market value.
Shares in Anglo tumbled to trade down nearly 5% the
following day on fears it could lose a slice of one of its more promising
operations, and on concerns over what it might do with the cash. But what
Codelco had touted as the "deal of the century" unravelled just a
month later.
Codelco insists it had to reveal its hand and give advance
notice of the bridging loan, and hence plans to buy the stake, because of
Japanese regulations governing Mitsui.
Sure enough, Anglo fired back with the surprise stake sale
to Mitsubishi for $5.4bn, asserting the deal effectively cuts Codelco's stake
option to a maximum of 24.5%.
An enraged Codelco, which bought the option from smaller
state-owned mining company ENAMI in 2008, has since launched legal action
against both Anglo and Mitsubishi, stating it ultimately seeks to reverse their
stake deal.
A 2002 revision of the 1978 contract says that if a third
party has bought a stake in Anglo's southern properties, that percentage must
be subtracted from the 49% stake that Codelco was eligible to buy.
According to Anglo, Mitsubishi's ownership of 24.5% of the
properties halves the percentage Codelco has an option to buy. But Codelco is
touting the contract's stipulation of "good faith" to assert that
Anglo violated the agreement by preemptively selling a share of its properties
deliberately to undermine Codelco's option.
Most legal experts see the London-listed miner's reasoning
as stronger, but warn that the Chilean legal concept of "good faith",
though elusive in its definition, has proved crucial in past cases.
"In Chile, our contracts are relatively short ... and
good faith is used to plug holes," said Fernando Bravo, a lawyer who
specialises in mining and energy with the Prieto y Compania law firm in
Santiago. "It's frequently used. But the specifics (of a contract) trump
its generalities."
If Anglo and Codelco fail to settle, experts estimate the
case could drag on for up to four years due to court backlogs and the
complexity of the legal battle. Chile's judicial system is widely seen as independent
from the government but it hasn't faced a multi-billion, tri-continental
dispute of this magnitude involving the Chilean state.
"I don't see a risk of chauvinism or nationalism,"
Bravo said. "A battle in Chile doesn't guarantee a victory for Codelco in
the slightest ... I wouldn't be scared if I were Anglo."
An embarrassing defeat for Codelco on its home turf could
have deep consequences for the firm's leadership, the government and private
miners in Chile.
A clutch of angry lawmakers even floated the idea of again
raising mining royalties, which the government revamped in 2010 to help boost
revenues for reconstruction after a devastating earthquake.
However, abrupt changes to the mining industry in Chile are
seen as improbable.
A Codelco defeat would likely further hammer the government
of Pinera, whom recent polls show to be the least popular Chilean leader since
General Augusto Pinochet's 1973-1990 dictatorship. A stake in Anglo's prized
properties would be a boon for the state coffers as Codelco contributes about a
fifth of government revenues.
Chile's private miners, which include global heavyweights
Xstrata and BHP Billiton, are warily watching the face-off and quietly hoping
for a swift settlement.
They fear a long battle could sour relations between the
government and private firms and possibly lead to tougher regulations and even
a fresh revamp of the royalties they pay.
Negotiation breakdown
Hopes for an out-of-court agreement may be overblown.
It seems Hernandez, an efficient manager named copper man of
the year for 2010 by the Copper Club industry group, and Cynthia Carroll,
Anglo's first female and first non-South African CEO, have never seen eye to
eye.
The executives both say they broached the issue of the option during the annual Davos economic forum in January this year.
The firms discussed in July the possibility that Anglo buy
the stake option, but Codelco says the price offer was derisory. Contact
petered out from there.
Hernandez, known for his pride and now at the zenith of his
career, is seen unlikely to back down. Carroll has come under pressure over
some of her decisions and investors have pressed for a steadier hand at Anglo,
which has been cautious in recent years after fighting off takeover approaches.
While a personality clash may have derailed talks, the
standoff is also testament to a metamorphosis at Codelco.
The 2010 arrival of Hernandez, formerly BHP Billiton's head
of base metals, and changes in Codelco's corporate governance structure, have
transformed the firm's management to resemble its more competitive,
private-sector peers.
A bolder Codelco is executing a $17.5bn investment plan to boost output to more than 2.1 million tonnes by 2020 from an estimated 1.7 million tonnes this year.
It has also restructured its divisions and in October raised
a record $1.15bn via bonds.
"Now Codelco is a state company, not a government
company," said Juan Carlos Guajardo, head of the Santiago-based copper
think tank CESCO. "The board doesn't respond to the country's political
colour ... And you can tell. You see a far more proactive attitude."
Anglo also underestimated the revamped state miner, betting
it wouldn't be able to muster enough funds to exercise the option, Guajardo
said.
But Codelco is on the back foot, and the bid to buy its
first major stake in a deposit to reinforce its position as the world's leading
copper miner could backfire by denying it a key strategic purchase and exposing
a major tactical error by Hernandez.
Codelco should have anticipated that Anglo could ultimately
sell part of the eligible stake after the London-listed company invested $2.8bn
in the flagship mine, and should have actively negotiated.
However, the government has made clear it is standing by
Codelco, and by extension Hernandez.
Formerly called "The Disputed One", the Los
Bronces mine is living up to its name.