Loading...
See More

Questions over Lonmin exec skills

Dec 04 2012 14:49 Mzwandile Jacks

Company Data

Lonmin plc [JSE:LON]

Last traded 0
Change -1,6
% Change 0
Cumulative volume 918907
Market cap 18.40bn

Last Updated: 01-10-2014 at 04:26. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

Aquarius, Lonmin maintain platinum rally

Lonmin snubs Xstrata takeover proposal

Lonmin to price share offer at 45% discount

Lonmin retrenchments a last resort

ANCYL bemoans Lonmin plans

Lonmin warns future at stake

 

Johannesburg - The Cape Town-based Element Investment Managers (EIM) has written a letter to the chairperson of Lonmin [JSE:LON] Board, Roger Phillimore, drawing his attention to a director that has a material conflict of interest.

“We voted against this high profile director at the Lonmin 2011 AGM,” said Mohamed Shafee Loonat, the portfolio manager at EIM, without naming the director.

“Our engagement activity, research, specialist presentations, our Advisory Board and our careful proxy voting all help to provide information for our investment team to better understand the risks of the industry and what action Boards and executives are taking to mitigate them.”

The events at platinum miner Lonmin's Marikana mine where more than 50 people were killed since August when miners went on strike demanding better pay, had been challenging for all stakeholders, including shareholders, he admitted.

“We have written to the Chairperson ... also encouraging Lonmin to work with the platinum industry, through the Chamber of Mines, to engage national government for appropriate infrastructure and to engage local government for bulk services,” Loonat said in a note.

“We have also enquired if the Board is sufficiently diverse with the correct skills to ensure sustainable earnings in the short, medium, and long-term.”

EIM also asked if the company had the right balance of executive skills and experience in place.

It also pointed out its interest in the future action the company planned to take with the housing allowance.

The Mining Charter housing requirement is important, taking into account worker and community challenges. It has been alleged that many miners that live in and around Marikana live there ironically because of the living-out allowance the mines pay so that they don’t have to provide on-site accommodation.

Many critics have asserted that platinum mines have a responsibility to house their workers and, along with the local government, to develop appropriate infrastructure.

“We will continue to use active ownership tools, including ESG integration, engagement and proxy voting to improve investee company leadership, encourage sustainable practices (particularly safety) and transparent disclosure in the mining industry,” Loonat said.

From the Marikana tragedy EIM had learnt that a greater margin of safety is often required for material social risks in the “computation” of South African company fair value.

“We are of the opinion that the Marikana events will encourage the integration of material social issues by mainstream investors in their investment analysis and decision-making in the same way that the BP explosion in the Gulf of Mexico encouraged the integration of environmental and governance issues,” he said.

 
lonmin
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...