All data is delayed
See More

Court: Harmony must pay for acid water

Jul 02 2012 19:02

Company Data


Last traded 21
Change 0
% Change 0
Cumulative volume 1495434
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Pretoria - Harmony Gold Mining Company [JSE:HAR] must continue paying for pumping and treating acid mine water in and around the Orkney gold mine, the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ruled on Monday.

Judge Tati Makgoka dismissed an application by the Harmony Gold Mining Company for the court to set aside a November 2005 directive by the department of water affairs under the National Water Act's anti-pollution section.

Harmony Gold contended the directive no longer applied to it since it sold the mine to Pamodzi Gold Orkney in 2007 and is no longer the owner.

Pamodzi went into provisional liquidation in 2009.

The departmental directive forced Harmony and other companies mining in the Klerksdorp, Orkney, Stilfontein and Hartebeesfontein (Kosh) area of the North West province to share the costs of pumping and treating acid mine water.

The directive was to remain in effect until the mining houses had reached an agreement on the long-term management of mine water in the area - an agreement that was never concluded.

Harmony approached the court for relief when the department refused to withdraw the directive.

The company maintained the directive was unreasonable and constitutionally impermissible as there was no longer any link between it and the land or the pollution.

Judge Makgoka said the directive was issued when Harmony owned the land.

"The applicant's mining activities polluted and contributed to the pollution of the underground water in the Kosh area," he said.

"The applicant derived financial benefit from its pollution activities.

"Without fully complying with the directive, and while the obligations in terms of the directive remained unfulfilled, the applicant disposes of its entire issued share capital to Pamodzi in August 2007.

"It is therefore not correct that the applicant is obliged to take responsibility for others' contribution to the pollution."

He said the directive required of Harmony to take measures, among others, for pollution which occurred while it owned the land.

"There is therefore a clear causal and moral link between the directive and the applicant's pollution activities."

Makgoka said Harmony's interpretation of the act would lead to a glaring absurdity in that a landholder who caused pollution through his activities could escape his obligations by simply disposing of the land.

Such an interpretation would defeat the purpose and principles of the National Environmental Management Act, the Water Act and Constitution, he said.

"Until the applicant fully complies with the directive, the directive remains valid," Makgoka concluded.

harmony gold  |  acid mine water



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

Almost all working South Africans fear losing their jobs

Previous results · Suggest a vote