Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Med aids urged: Be reasonable

Oct 28 2003 08:46 Antoinette Pienaar

Related Articles

Medical benefits costs queried

Medic scheme admin costs abate

Med Schemes Council deny blame

 

Top Stories

Gauteng road project costs rocket

May 25 2012 13:58

The costs of the first phase of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project have increased significantly to almost R90bn, according to a report.

Greek euro worries pressures rand

May 25 2012 19:13

Uncertainty over the future of the euro zone returned to push the rand down against the dollar.

JSE halts 'incorrect' trade

May 25 2012 11:36

The JSE has identified and stopped "incorrect" trades from one of its members, and will reverse the trades and lower the session's total value after the close.

 
Share Share line Print
Johannesburg - The "old excuses" for huge premium increases by medical aid funds annually are not acceptable any more, says the National Consumers Union.

It says it is now high time that the Council of Medical Schemes takes action.

The union was reacting on Monday to announcements by several medical aid funds that they would have to increase their premiums higher than the inflation rate next year.

Union chairperson Lillibeth Moolman says that, with the strong rand and a single-digit inflation rate, there's no reason to increase premiums by up to 18% as proposed by some medical aid funds.

She says: "The old story that the increases are a result of expensive modern technology, an attempt to reach reserve levels (25% for 2004) and compulsory chronic benefits are not acceptable any more.

"It's time the administrators go back to the drawing board and start again," she says.

Pat Sidley of the Council of Medical Schemes says they have received only a few applications to increase premiums, as required by law, and she can't say how the picture will look like next year.

Not chasing 'super profits' - consultant

"Perceptions that premiums may increase by 20% on average are just fiction at present."

It seems as if most large medical aid funds will increase their premiums for next year by between 11% and 15%, but some may increase by 18% and more.

Bernie Clark, deputy chief of health-care consultations at Alexander Forbes Financial Services, says he doesn't think medical aid funds want to show "super profits".

They are merely over-cautious and conservative, because they are afraid of the impact of compulsory minimum chronic benefits, which will be introduced next year.

Gary Taylor of Medscheme medical aid administrators says some of their medical aid funds are not planning premium increases and others will increase by between 5% and 10%.

The few schemes that are planning to introduce higher premiums, are doing so to build up the obligatory 25% reserve levels for next year.

Adrian Baskir of Old Mutual says medical inflation of between 8% and 15% is another reason for increases. Premiums for their Oxygen fund's nine options are to increase by 11% on average.

Baskir and Taylor sounded a warning that people shouldn't focus on the average increase, but on the financial implications of each plan.

Average expected premium increases from January 1 2004 (reserve levels have to be 25% at the end of next year) are:

Medihelp 14,6% (reserve, end September - 22,67%)

Medshield 12,6% (reserve, end 2002 - 7,21%)

Liberty 11% (reserve, end 2002 - 13,84%)

Fedhealth 14,8% (reserve, end 2002 - 14,35%)

Resolution Health 12,81% (reserve, end 2002 - 16,49%)

Bonitas - standard 4% (reserve, end 2002 - 10,49%)

Discovery 13,3% (reserve, end September -10,2%)

Oxygen 11% (reserve, end September - 23%)

Metropolitan Health closed fund 10% to 13%.

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
Facebook's intrinsic value
May 23 2012 11:32

When it comes to judging a company’s worth, value investors like Warren Buffett look at intrinsic value. By that measure, Facebook’s shares are worth less than $10. A Reuters analyst breaks down the math. (Reuters)

NicolaaSmith

CIPPA equals automatic zero erosion in the constant item economy We do not have stable – as in fixed real value – money. The real value of money is generally accepted by the public at large to be stable – as in fixed – in low inflation economies, but this is not true. The be... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...