Related Articles
Top Stories
May 25 2012 13:58
The costs of the first phase of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project have increased significantly to almost R90bn, according to a report.
May 25 2012 19:13
Uncertainty over the future of the euro zone returned to push the rand down against the dollar.
May 25 2012 11:36
The JSE has identified and stopped "incorrect" trades from one of its members, and will reverse the trades and lower the session's total value after the close.
Johannesburg - South Africa's Competition Commission has
recommended to the Competition Tribunal that the proposed merger between Masscash
Holdings and Finro Enterprises, trading as Finro Cash & Carry, be prohibited.
Masscash is a wholly owned subsidiary of Massmart Group.
The Commission said in a statement that Masscash and Finro compete in the market
for the wholesaling of grocery products in the Port Elizabeth region and surrounding
areas.
Grocery products include, amongst others, food, health and beauty products.
Masscash and Finro sell their products to independent traders and smaller retailers
which then on-sell to consumers, primarily those in the lower living standard
categories.
"As part of our investigation, we surveyed nearly 400 retailers who buy from these
wholesalers to have a clear understanding of the region. We saw this merger removing
an effective competitor in the food sector, a priority sector for the Commission,"
Competition Commissioner Shan Ramburuth said.
"All consumers are suffering under the burden of food inflation, but what is very
concerning is this merger could have affected adversely the poorest of the poor who
are suffering the most," Ramburuth added.
The commission said it recommendation to prohibit the merger was based on the
finding that Masscash and Finro are the closest competitors to each other in the Port
Elizabeth region and surrounding areas. This rivalry between the merging parties
benefits consumers, particularly those in the lower living standard categories.
The acquisition of Finro by Masscash would allow the merged entity to
significantly raise prices in the affected markets to the detriment of consumers.
"The commission, therefore, was of view that the proposed merger will
substantially prevent or lessen competition in the affected markets. In addition,
there were no efficiency or public interest gains that would outweigh the potential
anti-competitive effects of the proposed merger," it concluded.
- I-Net Bridge