Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Listed property: is bigger better?

Jan 28 2009 11:31 Jade Menezies

Related Articles

SA listed property shake-out

Redefine in R12.3bn deal

SA tops global property stakes

Property stocks on the blocks

Growthpoint on foreign radars

UK mall owners feel the pain

 

Top Stories

Gauteng road project costs rocket

May 25 2012 13:58

The costs of the first phase of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project have increased significantly to almost R90bn, according to a report.

Greek euro worries pressures rand

May 25 2012 19:13

Uncertainty over the future of the euro zone returned to push the rand down against the dollar.

JSE halts 'incorrect' trade

May 25 2012 11:36

The JSE has identified and stopped "incorrect" trades from one of its members, and will reverse the trades and lower the session's total value after the close.

 
Share Share line Print

Johannesburg - With mega property mergers taking place, shareholders may lose out on the advantages of more specialised property companies, say experts.

But the advantages of larger, diversified property companies may make it all worthwhile.

"In smaller, more specified companies, a combination of a few properties with exposure to a specific property sector may have the potential to outperform a larger, diversified portfolio," said property portfolio manager at Coronation Fund Managers, Anton de Goede.

"But on the other hand if they do badly, those shareholders will suffer. Mega-mergers bring risk diversification - they are less dependant on the success or failure of specific properties or sectors."

De Goede's comments come as JSE-listed property company Redefine Income Fund in mid-January announced its intention to buy ApexHi Properties and Madison Property Fund Managers in a R12.3bn transaction.

Executive director of Madison Property Fund Managers, Wolf Cesman, said the benefits of combining different property companies, like the potential Redifine-ApexHi-Madison merger, "far outweigh the perceived advantages of the specific portfolios".

ApexHi's property portfolio comprises 153 properties in Gauteng's central business districts, and a further 150 properties around the country.

Madison manages properties for JSE-listed property companies Hyprop, ApexHi and Redefine.

Bigger property companies allow for greater liquidity, exposure to international markets and wider groups of investors, say commentators. They also tend to spread risk, allowing companies to be more resilient during tough times, and they are generally big enough to get on to the indices which will allow unit share prices to increase.

"The three most important benefits include the spread of risk, better growth and higher earnings" said Cesman.

To put it in perspective: in order for the merged Redefine distributions to decline by 1 cent per unit, Redefine would have to lose R25m: "This is a big number, and chances are this will not happen barring severe unforeseen circumstances," said Redefine Income Fund CEO, Brian Azizollahoff.

Should the merger be completed, it's expected that ApexHi's rating will improve, which will allow it to compete for acquisitions and enhance its yields. "We have spent time and money on the improvement of our [ApexHi's] portfolio with the goal of always enhancing our yield. The merger would allow us to continue to achieve that goal," said ApexHi managing director, David Rice.

There is a case for both larger and specialised property companies, said de Goede. "What potential shareholders must look at is the strategy of the fund and how it fits into one's entire investment portfolio. There is value to be added by both. One needs to look beyond the 'bigger is better' strategy".

Ultimately, shareholders will need to assess their reasons for buying property shares. "If they buy shares because they want to target a specialised area then no, bigger is not necessarily better. If they want exposure to property as asset class then yes, bigger is better." said de Goede.

- Fin24.com

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
Facebook's intrinsic value
May 23 2012 11:32

When it comes to judging a company’s worth, value investors like Warren Buffett look at intrinsic value. By that measure, Facebook’s shares are worth less than $10. A Reuters analyst breaks down the math. (Reuters)

NicolaaSmith

CIPPA equals automatic zero erosion in the constant item economy We do not have stable – as in fixed real value – money. The real value of money is generally accepted by the public at large to be stable – as in fixed – in low inflation economies, but this is not true. The be... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...