• BEE winners and losers

    Creating real change and real jobs requires a new ideology, says Gerhard Papenfus.

  • Governance matters

    Addressing risk well and timeously can be a source of growth, says Ian Mann.

  • Road to riches

    Taxpayers keep funding structures with big plans but who knows what efficacy, says Mandi Smallhorne.

See More

Maroga to cough up after losing appeal

Nov 28 2011 09:51 Loyiso Sidimba

Related Articles

Maroga loses bid for reinstatement

Maroga departed with fat payslips

Maroga insulted Hogan after axing

Sacked Eskom CEO fights back

Maroga paid bonus after sacking

Maroga appeals R85m claim dismissal


Johannesburg - Former Eskom chief executive Jacob Maroga will have to pay hundreds of thousands of rands to some of the country’s leading lawyers after a full bench appeal against his unceremonious departure from the power utility was dismissed with costs.

Unless Maroga applies for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), he will have to pay top advocates Tim Bruinders, Paul Pretorius, Palesa Khoza, Feroze Boda, Benny Makola and Kameshni Pillay, who represented Eskom and former public enterprises minister Barbara Hogan.

Last Wednesday a full bench - comprising judges Pieter Meyer, Mlindelwa Makhanya and Phillip Coppin - at the South Gauteng High Court dismissed with costs Maroga’s appeal to have a last year’s December judgment and order set aside.

Last year, Judge Thokozile Masipa also dismissed with costs Maroga's application to force Eskom to reinstate him as chief executive earning R5m a year, or pay him R86m in damages. Maroga claimed Eskom had unlawfully repudiated his contract.

A senior counsel can charge up to R38 000 a day while a junior counsel charges about R8 000 a day. Maroga will pay a bill of costs based on rates prescribed by the court, but coming up with a final figure may take up to a month.

He will pay for all the reasonable costs incurred by Eskom, Makwana and Hogan in opposing the matter. These include drafting letters, perusing documents, preparing an attending court, making copies and consulting people involved.

During his appeal, Maroga's advocates Vincent Maleka and Vuyani Ngalwana did not want the court to award costs against their client, saying the costs order was ambiguous.

They argued that the state had failed to fulfil its constitutional and statutory obligations and should bear Maroga’s legal costs.

But Judges Meyer, Makhanya and Coppin said Maroga’s contract had been terminated by mutual consent with the board.

“The state has not been shown to have failed to fulfil its constitutional and statutory obligations,” the judges found.

In Maroga’s initial urgent court application to stop Eskom from filling the chief executive position, the power utility and Hogan were represented by leading advocates Wim Trengrove and Karel Tip.

Maroga’s application was also dismissed with costs by Judge Moroa Tsoka, who too found the contract termination was unlawful.

At the time Maroga did not seek the determination of the legality of his contract termination in the matter before Tsoka.

He later launched another court application against Eskom, its former chairperson Mpho Makwana and Hogan after his ousting in October 2009.

Maroga was booted out after offering his resignation, which the Eskom board accepted, followed by a fallout with then chairperson Bobby Godsell, who later walked away.

Makwana was appointed acting chairperson and chief executive.

Maroga won support from a number of top businessmen including Sandile Zungu, Sello Rasethaba and the Black Management Forum.

President Jacob Zuma’s office and Yunus Shaik were unsuccessful in their mediation attempts.

Maroga’s contract was due to end in April next year.

In court papers, Eskom claimed Maroga’s contract was terminated due to poor performance after he failed to produce a funding model to save the 88-year-old parastatal money and negotiate its long-term contracts.

But Maroga defended himself, saying his actions since his appointment in 2007 had saved Eskom R10bn.

Maroga's lawyer Leslie Mkhabela, public enterprises spokesperson Mayihlome Tshwete and Eskom did not respond to questions this week.

Makwana said he was unable to comment because he is a former Eskom chairperson.

But a legal source close to the case told City Press that as far as Eskom and Public Enterprises were concerned, the matter was over.

“He can go to the SCA or the Constitutional Court if he feels the matter has constitutional issues,” said the source.

At the time of his dismissal, Maroga, a Wits University electrical engineering graduate, had been at Eskom for 14 years as a senior manager and more than two years into his tenure as chief executive.

He described his tenure as one of the most difficult times in Eskom’s history.

Maroga managed the 2005 power crisis in the Western Cape and the 2007 national power disruptions, which became known as load shedding.

 - City Press 

eskom  |  jacob maroga



Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


Johannesburg has been selected to host the Global Entrepreneurship Congress in 2017. "[The congress] will ensure that small business development remains firmly on the national agenda and the radar screen of all stakeholders, the Small Business Development minister said.

This is the most expensive burger in the world!

You won't believe how much someone was prepared to pay for this burger!


Luxury living

Exclusive food items that WILL break the bank
Top 10 most expensive homes in the world
You can permanently live on a ship and sail the world!
These are the richest people on the planet!

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

How will you manage Vodacom’s price hike for contracts?

Previous results · Suggest a vote