Publications
Partners
Johannesburg - Extra-ordinary measures are needed to prevent power failures but Eskom is getting in the way, a legal expert said on Monday.
"Eskom is not prepared to let go of the power it harnesses as a monopoly in electricity generation. Yet Eskom is equally aware of its inability to produce sufficient electricity to avoid these rolling blackouts," said Happy Masondo, director at Werksmans Attorneys, in a statement.
The Medium Term Risk Mitigation (MTRM) project team established by the department of energy has produced a national plan to deal with the shortage of electricity in the immediate medium-term, from 2011 to 2016.
This plan is part of the second Integrated Resource Plan.
The MTRM project team has said that unless extra-ordinary steps are taken to accelerate the introduction of the Independent Power Producers (IPPs), there will be power failures from 2011.
"This declaration provides very little comfort to the South African consumers... who are acutely aware of the underlying problems of... Eskom, the national electricity utility, which continues to be characterised by contradictory or conflicting behaviour," said Masondo.
At the moment, Eskom has a maximum capacity of 41 000 megawatts while the country demands about 37 000 megawatts.
This leaves a reserve margin of about 10%, which is about half of what is internationally taken as acceptable, said Masondo.
Eskom and the department of energy are not keen on the acceleration of IPP or non-Eskom power generation.
"Instead, both Eskom and the [department of energy] have promised to move away from the unworkable single buyer office (SBO) model.
"As currently contemplated Eskom is the SBO to purchase all the electricity produced by IPPs, and on sell such electricity to the consumers."
Masondo said it seemed "short-sighted to continue to have Eskom in the driving seat of such a process when all indicators point to the need for South Africa to break the monopoly of the national utility".
The department of energy should "allow the multitudes of IPPs lining up to make the energy production more competitive to operate within a free-market economy".
"The simple and single reason is that Eskom is already crumbling under the weight of the existing energy crisis, how does it expect to add to its load before it sheds some of the weight causing it to crumble?" asked Masondo.
The IPPs should instead be allowed to generate electricity and sell it directly to consumers, instead of going through Eskom, argued Masondo.
Comment from Eskom was not immediately available.
"Eskom is not prepared to let go of the power it harnesses as a monopoly in electricity generation. Yet Eskom is equally aware of its inability to produce sufficient electricity to avoid these rolling blackouts," said Happy Masondo, director at Werksmans Attorneys, in a statement.
The Medium Term Risk Mitigation (MTRM) project team established by the department of energy has produced a national plan to deal with the shortage of electricity in the immediate medium-term, from 2011 to 2016.
This plan is part of the second Integrated Resource Plan.
The MTRM project team has said that unless extra-ordinary steps are taken to accelerate the introduction of the Independent Power Producers (IPPs), there will be power failures from 2011.
"This declaration provides very little comfort to the South African consumers... who are acutely aware of the underlying problems of... Eskom, the national electricity utility, which continues to be characterised by contradictory or conflicting behaviour," said Masondo.
At the moment, Eskom has a maximum capacity of 41 000 megawatts while the country demands about 37 000 megawatts.
This leaves a reserve margin of about 10%, which is about half of what is internationally taken as acceptable, said Masondo.
Eskom and the department of energy are not keen on the acceleration of IPP or non-Eskom power generation.
"Instead, both Eskom and the [department of energy] have promised to move away from the unworkable single buyer office (SBO) model.
"As currently contemplated Eskom is the SBO to purchase all the electricity produced by IPPs, and on sell such electricity to the consumers."
Masondo said it seemed "short-sighted to continue to have Eskom in the driving seat of such a process when all indicators point to the need for South Africa to break the monopoly of the national utility".
The department of energy should "allow the multitudes of IPPs lining up to make the energy production more competitive to operate within a free-market economy".
"The simple and single reason is that Eskom is already crumbling under the weight of the existing energy crisis, how does it expect to add to its load before it sheds some of the weight causing it to crumble?" asked Masondo.
The IPPs should instead be allowed to generate electricity and sell it directly to consumers, instead of going through Eskom, argued Masondo.
Comment from Eskom was not immediately available.
