• Nene's SAA nemesis

    No political figure seems to have the guts to speak out against Dudu Myeni, says Solly Moeng.

  • The mp3 revolution

    Ian Mann takes a look at the war between digital music and the compact disc.

  • Don't take us for fools

    It's time for businesses to stop thinking consumers are gullible, says Mandi Smallhorne.

All data is delayed
See More

BAT challenges Australian packaging laws

Dec 01 2011 10:28

Company Data


Last traded 827
Change 15
% Change 2
Cumulative volume 897128
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 25-11-2015 at 05:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

BAT gains from price hikes as Q3 rebounds

Upbeat BAT posts profit hike

BAT boosts Reinet NAV

BAT makes Colombian acquisition

Tobacco giant to fight packaging laws

Australia warned over tobacco plan


Sydney - British American Tobacco [JSE:BTI] (BAT) on Thursday launched a high court challenge against Australia's plain packaging law for cigarettes, claiming it infringes intellectual property rights.

The proceedings will act as a "test case" on the validity of the legislation relating to property rights of two of its brands, Winfield and Dunhill, the company said.

"If we’re successful the decision should apply to other property and brands sold by BAT," it said in a statement.

BAT believes it is both unconstitutional and invalid for the government to remove its trademarks and other intellectual property without compensation.

Under the ground-breaking law, all tobacco products sold in Australia will need to be in plain packaging from December 1 2012. Cigarettes will be sold in drab, olive-brown packets with large, graphic health warnings.

The government says tobacco use costs the country more than Aus$30bn a year in healthcare and lost productivity.

But the proposal to remove all logos and print company names in uniform font has angered tobacco firms, who say it will cut profits and see fake products flood the market because plain packaging is easier to reproduce.

Earlier this month, fellow global tobacco giant Philip Morris said it was seeking to suspend the law and wanted substantial compensation for the loss of trademarks.

BAT spokesperson Scott McIntyre said Canberra had left it no option but to take legal action.

"Obviously we’d rather not be in a situation where we’re forced to take the government to court, but unfortunately for taxpayers the government has taken us down the legal path," he said.

"Health Minister (Nicola) Roxon will now waste millions of taxpayers' dollars on legal fees defending plain packaging, even though she has said herself there is no proof it will reduce smoking rates.

"As a legal company selling a legal product we have consistently said we will defend our valuable intellectual property on behalf of our shareholders as any other company would."

british american tabacco


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


Marketing is a big concern in SA's small business community, followed by a lack of confidence and partnering with the wrong people, according to a survey.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

The 25 basis points interest rate increase is:

Previous results · Suggest a vote