Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

Web address land grab

Jun 15 2012 07:15 Reuters

Related Articles

Google cleared in Oracle suit

Google unveils internet glasses

Google plans low-price tablet

Web content removed after India warning

Digital privacy

Old vs new tech

 

London - An unprecedented land grab for new Web addresses began in earnest on Wednesday with fierce competition for new internet real estate including .app, .blog and .web from applicants hoping to break the near-monopoly of the .com top-level domain.

The ambitious plan to liberalise internet addresses attracted 1 930 applications, almost half of them from North America, with Web giants Amazon and Google applying for dozens of domains including .cloud, .buy and .book.

The liberalisation of top-level domains beyond the fewer than two dozen in existence - dominated by .com, .org and .net - is intended to stimulate competition and innovation by giving organisations more control over their Web presence.

Critics say the new suffixes are unlikely to catch on, and some trademark owners have complained that the move is causing them unnecessary expense - at $185 000 per application plus running costs - to defend their online turf.

Previous small-scale experiments in liberalising domains led to low take-up of suffixes such as .museum, .jobs and .travel.

"At the highest level, this is all about creating competition to .com," said Jonathan Robinson, non-executive director of internet registry services company Afilias, which has applied for more than 100 new domains on behalf of clients.

"That's where short, memorable, distinctive three-letter type terms become very interesting," said Robinson, whose organisation already provides key infrastructure for .org, .info and .mobi.

Competing applications were received for 231 domain names. The most popular were .app with 13 bids, .home with 11, and .inc with 12.

Technology giant Apple's claim to .apple was uncontested by the Apple music label or anyone else.

"The big names of the internet have either invested massively or not at all," said Stuart Durham, European sales director for Melbourne IT, which has handled 150 applications on behalf of clients.

"There appear to be no applications from Facebook or Twitter. There are different strategies in play here and some big gambles."

Just 17 applications were received from Africa, and 116 for names in non-Latin alphabets. Expanding the internet beyond the Latin alphabet was one of the original reasons behind the liberalisation drive, which began seven years ago.

US non-profit organisation the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) will now spend the rest of the year assessing the applications, with contested domains going to auction where more than one party has a legitimate claim. The first new domains are likely to come online in the first half of 2013.

Some critics, including senior figures at Google, have warned that the liberalisation risks effectively privatising the internet by giving already powerful Web players more scope to control portions of it.

"Our concern is that this could lead to more Facebook-style walled gardens as big brands seek to keep you in their own areas of the internet," said Stephen Ewart, marketing manager for Names.co.uk, a British domain-name registrar.

"Make no mistake, this change to the domain name world will lead to more competition and consumer choice, but it could also be viewed as a silent privatisation of the Web - for better or worse," he said.

The project is a key test for ICANN, whose authority to administer the Web's naming systems is being challenged by emerging nations who say it is too US-centric.

"The plan we have delivered is solid and fair," ICANN chief executive Rod Beckstrom told journalists at a news conference in London. "It is our fundamental obligation to increase innovation and consumer choice."

Nations - including China, Russia and Brazil - are pushing for ICANN's functions to be transferred to a body such as the United Nations, in which governments would have more control.

ICANN is set to net some $350m from the liberalisation project - about five times its annual budget.

Beckstrom said the organisation had priced the applications to cover its costs and that the use of any surplus would be decided by its community - which includes internet companies, governments and ordinary citizens. 

google  |  amazon  |  internet
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

A cash flow crunch often occurs in small businesses trying to balance cash coming in with cash going out. Watch this video to help you improve.
 
 

Disregard of interest rate impact deplored

A Fin24 user protests what he sees as disregard of the broader impact of increased interest rates on those who cannot yet say "bring it on" with a smile.

 
 

Start saving...

No need to keep up with the Joneses
Where can you stash your cash?
Time the key for retirement saving
Dummy's guide to saving

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...