• Busting Uber myths

    The ehailing firm is constantly trying, succeeding - and sometimes failing, says Ian Mann.

  • Trapped in a democracy

    The very people elected to bring benefits to all are undermining SA, says Solly Moeng.

  • Marikana spectre

    Five years after the bloody massacre calls for justice are growing louder, says Terry Bell.

Loading...

Knott-Craig gets emotional in court

Aug 07 2013 14:40
Alan Knott-Craig

Alan Knott-Craig poses with his book 'Second is Nothing'. (File: Duncan Alfreds, News24)

Company Data

MTN GROUP LIMITED [JSE:MTN]

Last traded 126
Change 0
% Change 0
Cumulative volume 7656694
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

VODACOM GROUP LIMITED [JSE:VOD]

Last traded 181
Change 0
% Change 0
Cumulative volume 1488656
Market cap 0

Last Updated: 01/01/0001 at 12:00. Prices are delayed by 15 minutes. Source: McGregor BFA

Related Articles

Former boss testifies in Vodacom case

Vodacom's revenue increases

Vodacom mum after settling DRC dispute

Vodacom, MTN 'desperate' for spectrum

MTN, Vodacom after Neotel

Vodacom fails to stop Please Call Me case

 

Johannesburg - Former Vodacom [JSE:VOD] CEO Alan Knott-Craig was accused of being evasive on Wednesday, when asked if MTN [JSE:MTN] planned to sue the company for stealing the Please Call Me idea.

"Your worship, the witness is being evasive about it," Cedric Puckrin, for former Vodacom employee Nkosana Makete, said in the South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg.

Knott-Craig responded: "I am not trying to be evasive, I am trying to answer as honestly as possible."

Makete took cellphone service provider Vodacom to court to get compensation for the Please Call Me service, which he claims he invented in 2000.

He said his boss at the time, Philip Geissler, promised in an oral agreement to facilitate remuneration negotiations with the company.

Geissler submitted the idea and said he would negotiate remuneration between Makete and Vodacom once it was developed and its technical and commercial feasibility had been ascertained.

On Wednesday, Puckrin questioned Knott-Craig about an email Geissler sent to Makete on March 8 2001, saying MTN was suing Vodacom for stealing the Please Call Me concept.

Puckrin asked if he was aware of the alleged legal action.

'I do not remember'

Knott-Craig responded: "I do not remember them [MTN] accusing Makate. I believe that they did not formally sue Vodacom for stealing their idea.

"I am not sure what happened between Geissler and MTN... What I can tell you, ultimately, we were not sued by MTN. But someone could've called with a verbal threat."

Puckrin said Makete wanted a share of the revenue generated from the idea.

Knott-Craig said Vodacom never had a profit-share or revenue-share agreement with employees who introduced new ideas.

He said he was not sure of the agreement Geissler made with Makete, and said profit-share would be "beyond anything that would be accepted" by Vodacom.

"This particular promise of sharing revenue within a company is not normal. I would've been surprised that he [Makete] believed that a company would share its revenue on an untested product," he said.

"To lead Makete to believe that [the reward he wanted] is beyond what the company could ever give."

He said a bigger bonus and a progression of rank would have been considered remuneration in terms of policy.

"No one has ever suggested revenue-share to me," Knott-Craig testified.

Revenue-share

"We do not make additional payments to people... Makete wanted payment for doing nothing other than having an idea for a moment in his life."

Puckrin read various paragraphs from Knott-Craig's biography, "Second is Nothing", illustrating his sense of business, how he made decisions, and that his word was his bond.

Knott-Craig became visibly emotional, looking down and away after the paragraphs were read. He had to clear his throat before speaking again.

Puckrin put it to him: "The culture you instilled in Vodacom in this sense was that you regarded your word as your bond - this is promulgated throughout."

Discussing the delegation of authority, Knott-Craig said he did not need to authorise an agreement with the board or shareholders if the payment was within the budget.

The delegation of authority determined who had the power to sign agreements at the company.

Makete first approached the high court in 2008, after he sent letters to Vodacom in 2007.

The matter was adjourned.


mtn  |  vodacom  |  please call me

NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
52 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
 

Company Snapshot

We're Talking About...

Savings Month

It's never too late to start saving. Visit our special issue and add your voice.
 

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

The proposal to nationalise SARB will

Previous results · Suggest a vote

Loading...