• Caught in the debt trap?

    Help us help you by taking our second annual Debt survey and you could win R3 000.

  • Rich man, poor man

    Culture change from below is the only way to overcome poverty, says Leopold Scholtz.

  • Tech bubble talk

    After the tech euphoria of 2013, the fast-moving sector has hit a speed bump.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
See More

Digital privacy

Jan 31 2012 07:13 John C Abell*

Related Articles

YouTube hits 4 billion daily video views

Google boosts small businesses in SA

Google makes search personal

Google results fall short

5 tech earthquakes in 2011

Google mulling online retail move

 

Stop me if you’ve heard this one:

Big social media company changes its privacy rules. The internet goes nuts. The tech press fuels the flames. Much hand-wringing and shouts of promises not kept ensue.

Sound familiar?

This time it’s not Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg who’s losing sleep. It’s Google’s Larry Page. The search giant changed its rules mid-game, and it’s getting an earful.

Google’s privacy changes are both less and more than meets the eye. The less: Google has been collecting all the data in question already, most for a long time.

The more: It’s one thing to collect data, quite another to change how you use it without giving your customers any flexibility. Google should be lauded for über transparency, but it’s hard to like ”Our Way or the Highway.”

The concept is pretty simple. You’ve allowed Google to cull a lot of personal facts and behavioral details, but each of the services Google provides has had its own privacy rules, and for the most part none of that information about you in each was indexed against the data in others.

Your Gmail details are over here, and your calendar deets are over there, and never the twain met. It makes lots of sense to tear down the walls between all the different Google services you may use, so that your likes and habits and movements and appointments are all aware of each other.

The question (and this is the eternal question about digital privacy): Is it as good for you as it is for Google to have all that information mashed up?

I’ve argued that the interests of Facebook, its members and the marketers who want to exploit that audience aren’t necessarily aligned. Facebook also hoards scads of information about you, and for about as long as Google has.

The social network’s privacy rules are, shall we say, somewhat more complex than Google’s. And nobody seems to care much, if you can infer that from Facebook’s steady increase in membership. (Now at 800 million, roughly 11% of the planet.)

Google has portrayed its changes as being part of an ever-improving symbiosis. One of the examples they highlight is actually a reasonable one: You have an appointment but you’re accidentally headed in the opposite direction.

In doing so you run the risk of being late. Using all the things Google and your smartphone know - your calendar, your location, the time of day, the traffic, weather conditions - a voice channels HAL 9000 and says: “Just what do you think you’re doing, Dave?”

Google’s changes, then, aren’t about the sleazy side of the ad business where non-anonymous facts about you are sold to the highest bidder.

They’re about using computing power no individual can possibly have to synthesise facts we can’t readily process that then make our lives simpler, more efficient and more satisfying.

Yes, this means allowing a public company to take custody of our most precious personal property: the building blocks of identity, personality and tendencies we may not even realise we have.

It’s not as if we haven’t been steadily prepared to take our relationship with the internet to a new level. Google got the same level of privacy-concern pushback when it launched Gmail nearly eight years ago, introducing the unheard of notion that your mail would be sniffed to serve up targeted ads.

Gmail, of course, is now a rousing success, and it ushered in the rest of Google’s eco-system - Google Docs, Google Calendar and ultimately Google+.

It also helped create Facebook, only slightly more than a twinkle in Zuckerberg’s eye when Gmail launched. Users of the world’s largest social network seem to have completely recalculated the TMI versus ads equation.

Our increased comfort level with this trade-off - my life is “improved” in direct proportion to my transparency and therefore marketability - is the foundation of a cultural revolution of which changes in online mores are only a part.

Both Google and Facebook - which just forced Timeline on members - know that the future is about circulating as much currency from everyone’s social graph as possible.

After all, Google is only now surfacing Google+ in its search results. And they both know that if they treat this privilege with the proper respect, we will just let them do it.

And though there will be missteps and adjustments and things we didn’t foresee, the privacy debate will recede and even become boring.

Because eventually we’ll grow more comfortable with what I suspect the debate is really about. If you’ll allow me one wild, psychobabble musing: Could it be that we’re just coming to grips with the possibility that Google and Facebook know us better than we know ourselves? - Reuters

*(Abell is the New York Bureau Chief for Wired and a former Reuters staffer.) 

google  |  facebook  |  internet privacy
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're Talking About: Small Business

Standard Bank is looking for 12 entrepreneurs to participate in a 10-part TV series. They could win a R1m investment into their dream.
 
 

The rich will pay - Mpofu

The EFF in Gauteng will focus all its energy on improving the lives of the poor, the party's premier candidate Dali Mpofu says.

 
 

Latest elections multimedia

Watch what happened when we blindfolded Helen Zille and asked her to eat random things
13 days to elections - news you need to know
11 Julius Malema quotes you'll never forget
DA won't get 30% - Zille

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...