Fin24

$100bn valuation

2012-02-01 07:30

Facebook’s imminent stock sale risks putting public stock markets to shame.

Investors will surely clamour for a piece of the social network. But unlike Google's 2004 initial public offering, everyone who’s anyone has already made a killing off Mark Zuckerberg’s dorm-room project.

At a $100bnbn valuation, it’s hard to imagine much could remain.

The list of who gained access to Facebook’s value-creation steamroller is extensive. It’s not just Silicon Valley elite, including Sean Parker, Peter Thiel and Zynga’s Mark Pincus.

The roster extends to global billionaires and, naturally, Goldman Sachs. Even Microsoft is up big.

In one respect, that’s good. It suggests innovative entrepreneurs can access ample capital from a diversity of sources. And that may mean fewer of the likes of Pets.com tap public investors.

But when the question of equality of opportunity in capitalism is being questioned like never before, Facebook shows one clear way the rich get richer.

Set aside the earliest funders. Thiel, who invested the year Google went public, gambled on a Harvard dropout with an idea. Accel Partners could easily have seen its $12.7m investment in 2005 vanish, rather than rise to $9bn on paper.

Later investors also took risks, though their procession looks more like the Davos caste system. At the $15bn mark, there was Microsoft and Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing.

Soon after, Russian Internet smarty-pants Yuri Milner cleverly offered to buy stock from Facebook employees. Bono’s Elevation Partners swooped in with a deal that might just allow it to raise another fund.

Later came Goldman, buying nearly $2bn of Facebook stock for private banking clients and itself at a $50bn valuation. Facebook staff shares were available on SecondMarket, but only to accredited investors with experience investing in private firms.

The worry is that after the investing aristocracy has feasted on Facebook, there’s little left for the hoi polloi.

Google’s lifespan as a private firm was shorter before debuting at $85 a share. They’re now $580 – a valuation approaching $200bn. For Facebook to match that performance it would need to become the world’s first $700bn company.

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own). 

Comments
  • dino.ducci - 2012-02-01 15:37

    Personally I think that a valuation of the company at $100bn is absurd. The company does make around #3bn in revenues but there has been questions raised from their advertisers that they do not get the same bang for their buck as google. Google offers targeted advertising based on user searches, while facebook uses demographic information to advertise.I think that once the hyoe fades there are going to be some unhappy investors in this stock.

  • pages:
  • 1