Data provided by iNet BFA
Loading...
See More

Commission: Medical schemes discriminate

Jul 15 2012 14:09 Sapa

Related Articles

Discovery defends admin fees

Medical schemes sceptical about NHI

Medical scheme tax credits to go to NHI

Private healthcare a 'brutal system'

Private healthcare on warpath

Members want probe into Discovery fee

 

Johannesburg - The National Consumer Commission wants "discriminatory" rules in medical aid schemes to be declared unconstitutional, The Sunday Independent reported.

According to the report medical aid schemes are sexist towards pregnant women and discriminates against foreigners.

The commission has turned to the Equality Court, where it is challenging four of South Africa's top medical aids and the Council for Medical Schemes.

The commission pointed to certain "discriminatory" clauses that technically exclude women who fall pregnant before they join the schemes from benefiting from the medical aid.

The respondents in the case were the council, Medscheme, which is an administrator of Bonitas and Fedhealth, Momentum Health and Medshield. Bonitas and Fedhealth were also respondents.

Director of legal services at the commission, Oatlhotse Thupayatlase, told the newspaper that when the Council for Medical Schemes was asked about the clauses it said they protected the schemes from "free riders" or people who took out medical aid schemes when they knew that they were pregnant and wanted to benefit.

Last June, the commission asked random medical aid schemes to submit their rules for investigation to see if they complied with the Consumer Protection Act.

It found that each medical aid had clauses stipulating a three-month general waiting period when someone joined and a "condition specified" waiting period of up to 12 months.

In its court papers the commission said: "The commission submitted to the schemes that the waiting period of three months and exclusion of 12 months for a condition that was there within three months of taking the cover, refers to 'pregnancy'.

"That being the case, it meant that the said clauses are discriminatory based on gender."

Medscheme argued on behalf of Fedhealth and Bonitas that the reason for the waiting period is to protect the scheme from people who join with the aim of undergoing an expensive procedure and then resign afterwards.

 
medical schemes
NEXT ON FIN24X

 
 
 

Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
4 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
 

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:

Small Business

A cash flow crunch often occurs in small businesses trying to balance cash coming in with cash going out. Watch this video to help you improve.
 
 

OneRandMan learns how money really works

National Savings Month is not only this month, it is every month from your very first salary slip, an expert warns OneRandMan and all South Africans.

 
 

Start saving...

Time the key for retirement saving
Dummy's guide to saving
Save money with affordable account
All about endowments

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...
Loading...