Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Franchise fallacies

Jul 02 2009 09:12 André Janse van Vuuren

Related Articles

Barking up the wrong tree

Franchises fire up Famous Brands

SA franchises lag global trend

'Many restaurants to go bust'

A hot franchising trend

'SA franchises should flourish'

 

Top Stories

Gauteng road project costs rocket

May 25 2012 13:58

The costs of the first phase of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project have increased significantly to almost R90bn, according to a report.

Zimplats fined for banking offshore

May 25 2012 12:44

Zimbabwe has directed banks not to provide services to a local unit of SA-owned miner Zimplats, after it continued to put money in offshore accounts.

JSE halts 'incorrect' trade

May 25 2012 11:36

The JSE has identified and stopped "incorrect" trades from one of its members, and will reverse the trades and lower the session's total value after the close.

 
Share Share line Print

FRANCHISING is often touted as a less risky stepping stone to business ownership.

The concept is cleverly punted by its supporters: work for yourself using a proven business system and the backup of those who perfected it.

The associated advantages for the franchisee seem incontestable - someone else has done the trial and error to tweak a business idea into an undisputed moneyspinner; that person will show you step by step how to replicate the formula; you immediately enjoy the trust and goodwill associated with a brand consumers are familiar with and, lastly, being part of a bigger collective gives you clout to procure stock and other necessities on the cheap.

This is indeed true for many franchise systems available in South Africa. Wimpy, MacDonald's, Steers, Chicken Licken, KFC and Nando's, all fast food and restaurant chains, are the first brands which come to my mind as successful franchises.

Trying to come up with other seemingly successful chains without resorting to a Google search, I can think of the names of well-known fuel retailers; more fast food and restaurant chains like Debonairs, Scooters, Mugg & Bean, Spur, Keg and King Pie; a few names in the health and beauty industry; groups doing business in the vehicle after-sales market and the franchise stores of well-known retailers like Pick n Pay, which will otherwise operate company-owned outlets.

The problem for first-time entrepreneurs seeking someone to show them the ropes while they find their feet as business owners is that they probably won't be able to afford the premium payable to own and operate an outlet of one of these brands.

I don't know the figures and procedures, but I'm not far off the mark when I say that for instance Wimpy outlets are owned by consortiums, or wealthy individuals with extensive experience in the restaurant industry.

The same probably holds true for the likes of Nando's, MacDonald's or Mugg & Bean. These groups will probably rather not open an outlet than entrust it to someone who still has to cut his or her teeth, not only in the restaurant industry but also as a business operator.

What this means is that a potential first-time business owner - an employed person seeking a decent business opportunity - will have to consider approaching one of the other about 500 franchise systems operating in the country. Unfortunately, the franchise-holding advantages do not hold true for a great many of these.

Consider for instance brand recognition and goodwill; would you, or any other Joe Soap, recognise the names of as many as 80 of the available franchise systems?

Are most of these groups really big enough to guarantee procurement savings based on scale?

If you are considering the franchise route as a way to opening your first business, keep the following in mind:

Has the company been around long enough to prove the sustainability of its business model?

It is alarming that the Franchise Association of South Africa (Fasa) grants membership to franchisors which have only been in business for a year. It is impossible to know whether any business will make it through the highs and lows of economic cycles if it has only been operating for one year.

Does the group have the capacity to assist you to establish your business, or is most of its activities centred on the recruitment of more franchisees?

This is especially true for newer franchise systems, where operators are under pressure to increase their volumes to cover business expenses.

Do not count on your franchisor to hold your hand on a daily basis. These people will be travelling the country to sell the concept to anyone prepared to listen. Also, they will probably run the business on a shoestring, with almost no resources available to fund a decent support infrastructure.

Is the business model really that special?

I recently came across a group doing business in the health and wellness industry. Its franchise package includes three days "all-inclusive" training at the group' head office. Here's my question: if it only takes three days for a franchisee to understand everything about the business, is it really worth paying a hefty premium for? Will Nando's train franchisees for only three days and then leave them to run a shop?

What information is included in the disclosure document?

Many franchisors think having a disclosure document translates into being a good franchise. However, visit Fasa's website (www.fasa.co.za) to find out what information has to be included in that document. If the franchisor doesn't want to disclose the details of former franchisees that have left the system, you should ask yourself why.

Would a bank lend you the money?

Even if you have your own funding available, approach a bank as well. Most have dedicated franchise departments - they won't be lending money to systems with a bad track record.

A final issue to consider is your reasons for wanting to operate your own business. Don't do it simply for the sake of owning a business; your ability to critically evaluate the available opportunities will be compromised.

- Fin24.com

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
Facebook's intrinsic value
May 23 2012 11:32

When it comes to judging a company’s worth, value investors like Warren Buffett look at intrinsic value. By that measure, Facebook’s shares are worth less than $10. A Reuters analyst breaks down the math. (Reuters)

NicolaaSmith

CIPPA equals automatic zero erosion in the constant item economy We do not have stable – as in fixed real value – money. The real value of money is generally accepted by the public at large to be stable – as in fixed – in low inflation economies, but this is not true. The be... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...