• Free market fallacies

    Higher income benefits could be trickling up instead of down, says Leopold Scholtz.

  • What awaits Greece?

    Julien Marcilly takes a look at what may transpire after the Greek referendum.

  • A loss of respect

    Can SA still attract the best as our leaders take questionable decisions, asks Solly Moeng.

See More

Constantia homeowner takes on Outsurance

Jan 11 2013 14:55

Related Articles

SA's rich nestled in Sandton, Cape Town

St Francis blaze insurance claims mount

Astrapak blaze impacts production

House price growth to stay subdued

SA’s wealthy open their wallets

Machanik slapped with R1.5m fine

Cape Town - A Constantia homeowner whose house was partially destroyed in a fire in May last year publicly expressed his anger at the proposed settlement offered by his insurer, Outsurance.

The homeowner erected a banner on his property, which was visible from Bordeaux Avenue, detailing the proposed payout by Outsurance which was a fraction of the total value of the insured property.

According to Outsurance, the main house, the outbuildings and stables on the property are insured for a total of R6.9m.

The fire, which was caused by an electrical fault, damaged only the main house with no damage to the rest of the buildings on the property.

The main house is valued at R5.6m.

Only a part of the building was damaged and the repairs to that area were estimated by Outsurance to cost R2.57m.

The banner has since been removed. 

According to Natasha Kawulesar, head of client relations at Outsurance, the client was advised of the settlement amount in June, six weeks after the initial claim.

The homeowner, disputing the payout offer, appointed his own experts to assess the cost of the repairs.

“Outsurance is confident that R2.57m is an accurate repair amount,” said Kawulesar.

Engineers appointed by both the client and Outsurance met to discuss the varying assessments to which a final proposal was sent to the insurer by the client.

“Our client raised concerns on the final cost of the repairs and we are meeting with him next week to have this matter resolved amicably,” said Kawulesar.

Outsurance has dismissed reported claims that it is suing the homeowner for damages. “No legal action has been taken against the client,” said Kawulesar.

The banner a Constantia homeowner put up after a fire destroyed part of his home.
It has since been removed.  (Pic: 2oceansvibe)


Follow Fin24 on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ and Pinterest.

outsurance  |  constantia  |  insurance


Read Fin24’s Comments Policy

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Company Snapshot

We're talking about:


There are no formal training requirements for becoming a beautician in South Africa. But it is highly recommended you complete a course in beauty therapy.

Money Clinic

Money Clinic
Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Voting Booth

SA’s new visa regulations are:

Previous results · Suggest a vote