Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

Winemaker, Land Bank in legal clash

Sep 07 2010 09:45 Philip de Bruin

Related Articles

World Cup adds body to SA wines

SA winemaker best in world

Three arrested for Land Bank fraud

Police follow Land Bank paper trail

Court bans online gambling

Winemaker gives hope with Faith

 

Top Stories

Zuckerberg loses almost $2bn

May 21 2012 17:30

Mark Zuckerberg's fortune dwindled by nearly $2bn to $18.7bn within minutes as trading began again in Facebook shares – which promptly plunged by nearly $5.

Eskom worried about immediate supply

May 22 2012 12:20

Power utility Eskom is concerned about meeting peak power demand as winter sets in although the situation should improve by mid-June, says CEO Brian Dames.

Power procurement plan welcomed

May 21 2012 18:36

The announcement of 19 successful bidders for the second phase of the renewable energy independent power producers' programme has received industry approval.

 
Share Share line Print
Cape Town - On Monday Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo opened the door of the Constitutional Court just a crack for well-known winemaker Nicolas Krone and his company, Twee Jonge Gezellen.

Ngcobo ordered Krone, his company and the Land Bank to present oral argument on November 18 in a dispute dealing with R37.9m the Land Bank is demanding from Krone and his company.

According to the Land Bank, Krone and Twee Jonge Gezellen signed an acknowledgement of debt for that amount in the Land Bank’s favour.

On the strength of the acknowledgement the Land Bank had obtained a provisional order from Judge Siraj Desai in the Cape High Court.

In terms of the order, R37.9m had to be paid to the Land Bank within two months.

Krone and his company’s argument in the Constitutional Court is that the entire legal process of provisional court orders is unconstitutional, and that the doors of the country's courts are effectively closed to it.

The provisional court order deprives Krone and his company of the right to prove in court, inter alia, that the amount owed is in reality only R20m.

This cannot be proved because the law requires the full amount of the provisional order – R37.9m – to be paid to the Land Bank first, before the case can proceed.

Krone said that neither he nor Twee Jonge Gezellen could afford to pay the R37.9m.

- Sake24

 
 
Comment on this story
5 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining
Putting Facebook's flop under the microscope
May 22 2012 10:21

Antony Currie and Breakingviews columnists dissect what went wrong with the social network's IPO. (Reuters)

Sasha

"Why did Naspers drop so much yesterday? Because Tencent fell hard on the Facebook share price. I wouldn't be too worried. Many traders were banking on a big rerating in social media companies following the Facebook IPO, this is one of the reasons Tencent is up 35% this year. So yes, they have been... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...