Register now for Fin24 Dashboard and get access to portfolios, watchlists, financial comparison tools, and a whole lot more to help you achieve your financial goals.

Data provided by McGregor BFA
All data is delayed
Loading...
Where am I? Home
 
Prices are delayed by 15min.
Join the Fin24.com conversation about JSE-listed stock by using every time you tweet.

2010 corruption claims disputed

Jul 16 2009 18:24

Related Articles

Watchdog probes stadium tenders

'2010 visitors must take care'

Relief over signed strike deal

Angola to build 28 hotels

QE2 'won't be permanent fixture'

 

Top Stories

Zuckerberg loses almost $2bn

May 21 2012 17:30

Mark Zuckerberg's fortune dwindled by nearly $2bn to $18.7bn within minutes as trading began again in Facebook shares – which promptly plunged by nearly $5.

Eskom worried about immediate supply

May 22 2012 12:20

Power utility Eskom is concerned about meeting peak power demand as winter sets in although the situation should improve by mid-June, says CEO Brian Dames.

Power procurement plan welcomed

May 21 2012 18:36

The announcement of 19 successful bidders for the second phase of the renewable energy independent power producers' programme has received industry approval.

 
Share Share line Print

Johannesburg - Construction group Murray & Roberts (MUR) on Thursday moved to categorically refute public allegations of corrupt practices associated with the stadium projects for the 2010 Fifa World Cup.

In a statement, the group said: "Murray & Roberts is a highly regarded South African business with significant global activities and about 35% of its shares held by international investors.

"A significant percentage of its order book is with the South African public sector, which includes some of its involvement in projects associated with the 2010 Fifa soccer World Cup.

"While recognising an expressed public concern at an evident history of corruption in the global construction industry, often in concert with the authorities for whom the industry works, it is incumbent on Murray & Roberts as South Africa's construction industry leader, to place some perspective on public allegations of corrupt practices associated with the stadium projects for the 2010 Fifa soccer World Cup, which allegations are categorically refuted insofar as they refer to Murray & Roberts," it said.

The construction group said it took an industry lead before any public concern was expressed on possible corruption in the construction industry, adding that it initiated internal audits across its various operations and commenced a programme of communication and training to assist employees in understanding competition law and its implications on the group.

"Where any evidence of possible collusion is uncovered, disclosure is made and as promised publicly by the group, full cooperation given to the authorities," it said.

Murray & Roberts pointed out that it has been involved only in construction of the Greenpoint Stadium, as a joint venture partner given the size, complexity and timeframe required of the project. "The joint venture is directly responsible for less than 40% of the total cost of the project.

"The remainder has been under the direct control of the City of Cape Town and includes professional team fees, client costs, selected subcontractors, provisional sums and prime cost items determined in advance by the professional team. The project has been substantially redesigned and construction has been accelerated to overcome delays in award and the consequence of the redesign," Murray & Roberts said.

It added that the original tender pricing for all 2010 Fifa World Cup stadia was investigated by the National Intelligence Agency at the request of government, and as far as Murray & Roberts was aware, no concerns relating to tender irregularities or pricing were raised.

"In fact, evidence given by Murray & Roberts to this enquiry showed underestimation of the capital costs in the original proposals supporting the 2010 Fifa soccer World Cup bid. Murray & Roberts reiterates its commitment to work with the competition authorities on concerns relating to the construction industry," the group concluded.

- I-Net Bridge

 
 
Comment on this story
0 comments
Comments have been closed for this article.
Putting Facebook's flop under the microscope
May 22 2012 10:21

Antony Currie and Breakingviews columnists dissect what went wrong with the social network's IPO. (Reuters)

Sasha

"Why did Naspers drop so much yesterday? Because Tencent fell hard on the Facebook share price. I wouldn't be too worried. Many traders were banking on a big rerating in social media companies following the Facebook IPO, this is one of the reasons Tencent is up 35% this year. So yes, they have been... Read their blog...

Recently updated
Podcasts
The Sishen saga

Legal expert Peter Leon on the increasingly complex legal wrangle over the Sishen Iron Ore mine. Time: 8:17 Listen Here...

Before you list

Is the clarion call of the JSE calling? Listen to Fin24’s expert panel discussion before you list your small business. Time: 17:29

Compare and Buy

Compare and apply for hundreds of financial products from many suppliers.

Credit cards Medical aid Current accounts Think Money

Money Clinic

Money Clinic Do you have a question about your finances? We'll get an expert opinion.
Click here...

Loading...