The South African Broadcasting Corporation’s censorship is
bordering on ludicrous. So much so it’s forced Solidarity’s hand –
calling it a blatant violation of human rights. The Tshwane protests
are instead replaced by pictures of the beautiful jacarandas of
Pretoria, while radio shows with outside editors have been banned.
They’ve gone as far as banning call-ins, fearful of what may be said on
the phone lines. All in an attempt to protect the party that’s paying
the bills. The man at the centre of the storm is Hlaudi Motsoeneng, a
product of the ANC, so it shouldn’t really surprise anyone. c It’s a bumpy ride and another fascinating
contribution. – Stuart Lowman
By Ed Herbst*
“Motsoeneng is a product of the ANC. He‘s serving the party,
delivering only good news to the public. All this is happening in
defiance of Madonsela’s recommendations. This can only mean that the ANC
does not respect the Office of the Public Protector. If they did, they
would not only be embarrassed by Motsoeneng, but would have fired him
long ago.” Mcebisi Ndletyana, Associate professor of political science at the University of Johannesburg 18/6/2016
“… under the heavy-handed and incompetent management of Hlaudi
Motsoeneng we have seen worsening censorship. Motsoeneng has been given
sweeping powers to make editorial decisions — powers that he should not
have — and he is a danger to the public broadcaster’s integrity and
independence …”
R2K announcing a picket
outside SABC buildings in Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban on 20/6/2016.
This was not reflected on the SABC’s TV news bulletins even though
there were camera crews in each building. The SABC also did not cover
the news conference of the Democratic Alliance in which the gross pre-election bias of the state broadcaster was exposed.
It was the morning of 16 April 2004. I and SABC employees throughout
the country, had been told when we got to work that the CEO, Peter
Matlare was to make an important announcement.
The announcement left us shell-shocked and fearful.
Two years after he had left the SABC with a multimillion rand
severance package to become spokesperson for Membathisi Mdladlana the
Minister of Labour, Snuki Zikalala was back.
Fear and loneliness
No one was prepared, for fear of future repercussions, to express the
profound sense of trepidation and loneliness we felt at that moment.
Then Matlare crossed to Bloemfontein.
“Bloemfontein?”
There was a momentary pause which only heightened the tension – then a sepulchral voice boomed – “Welcome back Snuki!”
Matlare was as startled as the rest of us – “Who’s that?”
“Hlaudi,” came the reply.
Shortly thereafter the news of Motsoeneng’s defiance of Zikalala spread like wildfire among SABC staff.
Each mo rning a round robin news conference is held in which the
regional news offices outline the stories they are covering for the day
and they motivate to the heads of the Auckland Park news divisions why
their stories should be included in the final running order.
At one such news meeting Zikalala told Motsoeneng – so the story went
– that he did not want to speak to him as a reporter, he wanted to
speak to the Regional Manager in Bloemfontein. Motsoeneng’s reported
reply staggered us: “No, you will speak to me. You will respect me.”
I stress that this was simply what was relayed to me but it was a pervasive topic of discussion at the time.
Fear and discontent
To provide context: Just three months after Matlare’s announcment – on 25 July 2004 – Chris Barron wrote of Zikalala in the Sunday Times:
“To say that the SABC is not a happy place is putting it mildly. Fear
and discontent stalk the newsroom at Auckland Park as former ANC
political commissar Snuki Zikalala forces his underlings to toe the
government line.”
Five months thereafter, at the end of January 2005, Peter Matlare
announced his resignation and said he wanted to leave immediately. He
was just part of a general exodus.
Zikalala, in an interview (‘Snuki-sikelel-iafrika) with Angella Johnson carried in the Mail & Guardian
on 17 October 1997, openly acknowledged his life-long hatred of whites
and constantly walked around the SABC newsrooms saying that he saw “too
many white faces”. In part the exodus can be ascribed to this. Pippa
Green, Charles Leonard, John Perlman and Jacques Pauw, to cite a few,
soon found the situation after his return unbearable and left in short
order. Before them it was people like Max du Preez, Allister Sparks and
Sarah Crowe.
Motsoeneng’s enthusiasm for Zikalala quickly cooled however. His complete indifference to Zikalala’s power and his influence
within the ANC and the widespread fear he evoked, was buttressed when
it became known in September 2008 that he was suing Zikalala for defamation.
Not for the first time Motsoeneng was to prove an immensely
destabilising force within the SABC and you can find a useful timeline
in an article I wrote for Media Online two years ago.
Baba loves him
Motsoeneng’s denial that he is an Auckland Park conduit to President Jacob Zuma was shot down in flames by Communications Minister Faith Muthambi who memorably said “But Baba loves him, he loves him so much. We must support him.”
But why was Motsoeneng so boldly unafraid of Zikalala whose nefarious news practices have been made a matter of judicial record and who was included in a chapter in Alexander Parker’s book,
“50 People who stuffed up South Africa”, a chapter which closed with
this sentence: “But for the colour of his skin, he would have done well
under Vorster or Botha.”
To understand why we felt Motsoeneng’s attitude towards the man whose
return he had initially welcomed constituted almost incomprehensible
bravery you have to take cognisance of the role played in Zikalala’s
life by Joe Modise.
Modise was the most hated, feared and reviled senior member of the
ANC in exile and this is widely reflected in the books of people like Paul Trewhela, RW Johnson and, more recently, Amin Cajee.
When Modise died, his family called on Zikalala to be spokesman and
the media liaison person and both he and Modise were mentioned in the
unchallenged testimony of Olefile Samuel Mnqibisa before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.We finally understood Motsoeneng’s supreme self-assurance when
Noseweek issue number 179 was published in September 2014. The opening
sentence read: South Africans are trying to ?gure out the secret
hold Hlaudi Motsoeneng has on his position as Chief Operations Of?cer of
the South African Broadcasting Corporation.The answer came midway through the article which was headlined Daddy. The power that drives Motsoeneng’s rise: One
SABC insider said the “key connection” was that Motsoeneng’s father was
a “powerful spiritual leader”, with whom the president consulted in
“spiritual and ancestral matters”.The closing sentence read: If it is true that having a father who
provides ancestral expertise to the President trumps all else,
Motsoeneng has good reason — for now — to sleep easy.“For now” depends on how long the ANC’s well-known taxpayer-funded Stalingrad strategy, which has worked so well to keep Number One from realising his dream of a day in court, works for Motsoeneng.
So I hear Hlaudi Motsoeneng suspended 3 senior
SABC journalists after they objected to his ban on reflecting newspaper
headlines on radio
It did not last long in the case of another Jacob Zuma confidante,
Ellen Tshabalala, who was eventually forced to resign and devote herself,
so far without success, to the quixotic but so far unsuccessful quest of
tracking down the villainous canine which so ungraciously ate her
homework.
When that happens I must say I will miss Motsoeneng, the regular entertainment he provides and in particular, the startling images with which he became associated.
Lest I be accused of a Hefneresque obsession with feminine pulchritude let me stress that the famous one of “I am Hlaudi Motsoeneng baby!” with the Venda nubiles is not my favourite.
No, my favourite is encapsulated in this YouTube clip and recounted in this Mail & Guardian article.
On 14 March 2014 I was watching the SABC channel 404 7pm TV news
bulletin – the flagship news broadcast on the 24-hour news channel –
when up popped the weirdest news story I have ever seen.
The opening shot reveals men dressed in brightly-coloured clerical
raiment. They seem to be speaking in tongues and one of them looks like
he is suffering from a virulent and possibly terminal combination of the
ague and St Vitus dance.
Surreal performance
All this was happening over the prone body of, I initially thought,
Hlaudi Motsoeneng because he was the subject of this surreal performance
– but the body, clad in a Hlaudi-type suit, was wearing modish,
stiletto-heeled shoes!
The story was about what our media practitioners called “fringe
church leaders” exorcising a host of devilish demons who had apparently
taken up residence in the offices of the Public Protector. The “demonic
forces” were allegedly galvanising her into unjust criticism of our
hero.
It was only a few seconds later that I realised that what I had
initially had assumed was Hlaudi was actually the strikingly beautiful
woman wearing a clerical collar in an audience cutaway shot.
The men of the cloth were angry. Madonsela, they said, was possessed
by “demonic forces which planned to derail the revolution and the
freedom of our people”. Furthermore, she was “Poisoning the atmosphere”.
You could not make this stuff up if you were a Hollywood script writer of the Timothy Leary persuasion.
Not all the images evoke incredulous mirth.
On 13 April, the head of SABC news Jimi Matthews, bowing, scraping,
fawning and tugging manically at his forelock, waxed lyrical in
parliament about Hlaudi’s sartorial splendour.
The way you dress
“It has to do with personality. It has to do with determination.
Sometimes I think it has to do with the way you dress,” Matthews gushed.
I know that when you have to lave the nether end of your boss, subtle hyperbole does not go amiss, but, get real.
I can promise you that Hlaudi’s glow-in-the-dark purple suits have
not been provided by Huntsman, Brioni or Cifonelli and his shiny ties
with purple polka dots the size of industrial ball bearings were not
provided by Charvet.
I can also assure you that he will not be appearing on the front cover of The Rake any time soon.
From blacklist to no list
Under the Mbeki administration there was outrage when, on 20 June 2006, the Sowetan broke the story about Snuki Zikalala blacklisting certain political commentators. Now Motsoeneng has effectively banned any discourse on politics from its airwaves. From black list to no list.
This is not only damaging to the esteem in which South Africa was
once held, it also damages our own self esteem. One has to empathise
with the view of Moshoeshoe Monare who said that Hlaudi Motsoeneng’s
continued tenure as head of the SABC insults the struggle.
Is it too much hope for – that Luthuli House will hear his poignant cri de cœur?
Ed Herbst is a pensioner and former reporter who writes in his own capacity.