Share

The Private Dinner – bringing politics to the table

Regular Biznews columnist Cees Bruggemans brings some global political advice to the table in his latest insightful piece. Discussing the leaders of four of the top economies in the world (with a bit of Jacob Zuma being thrown in the mix), Cees contemplates all things geopolitical and what he sees developing over the next few years for the Western and Eastern powerhouses of the world. Well worth a read if global politics capture your attention. – Tracey Ruff

By Cees Bruggemans    

The G8 must be an interesting bunch. But you really need global principals only to get to the essence of things. So geopolitically one could do without Cameron, Hollande, Renzi, Abe & the Canadian, while Xi now outranks all of them, yet isn’t a G8 member. Of course, the others wouldn’t dream of getting explicit about this, so one could perhaps lay on a private dinner party, far from the Maddening Crowd?

And so, on time, on the appointed evening (we all know this is going to be night work), we find Obama, Merkel, Putin & Xi already at the table. What is unusual about this combination is that two of the four remain European in origin. A fifth guest has let it be known he will be a little late, but please start without him. He will catch up.

What to talk about? Obama the (increasingly realistic?) missionary, Merkel the pragmatic Westphalian realist, Putin the activist nationalist, and Xi the quiet emperor.

Perhaps first a quick sketch, to show how very different their backgrounds. It may help to understand slightly better their personal styles & missions.

Obama, the popular elected President, but hemmed in by a snarling Republican controlled Congress able to hamstring much of his legislative initiatives. Merkel, the popular politician (affectionately known as “Mutti”), still having to live with her largest opposition party in an alliance of convenience with all the democratic horse trading this implies.

Putin, the self-made Tsar of all the Russias in modern garb, popularly elected, but living in an oligarchic system of his own making where democracy is easily manipulated. And Xi, Princeling, fifth-generation (post-Mao, as we stick with imperial dynastic thinking), backed by sufficient party factions to have become Leader, having quickly consolidated his power, and projecting it with all the force of a quiet, dignified personality.

Their origins differ markedly. Obama, the brash young lawyer entering Congress and following a meteoric rising star in a democratic arena where only the most tenacious & focused (and winning popular hearts & minds) reach the top. Merkel & Putin both beneficiaries of incredible historic moments, Merkel having her Kohl, and Putin his Yeltsin, elevating both at crucial moments from nowhere to dizzy heights, and both having the emotional intelligence of shaping these exceptional opportunities and reaching their respective tops. Xi, in contrast, first and foremost Princeling, after a long but not necessarily gruelling Cook’s tour of the regions, getting himself noticed & elevated, until coming out on top.

This is not your average bunch, no matter the popular projecting in the daily news media. This is an exceptional crop of talent, weighing and being weighed, probing judiciously, storing away, formulating, shaping.

Kissinger described the onset of WW1 as a tragedy of abdication, as reigning politicians of the day in the preceding decade had lost control of events, giving up their prime responsibility: to stay sane & and in charge, keeping order when all progressively lost their heads.

An interesting litmus test. Will our dinner guests, even allowing for democratic election processes, shortly abdicate their global responsibility to keep ensuring sanity & order even when pursuing their respective national interests?

The interplay might become very tricky, difficult at times to distinguish, but it would be in nobody’s interest to succumb to irrationality and total destruction. Each knows that and is likely to act accordingly. An important assumption, despite all kinds of silly breakdancing and games of chicken daily.

So what would they talk about (they didn’t come for the food or wine, did they?).

I can see four issues: Russia being grinded by both European and Chinese encroachment and resisting this now actively. China projecting itself forcefully in East Asia, from Korea in the north all the way down the China Sea in the south. Iran as a nuclear power and how the Shia/Sunni schism may evolve in the larger Islamic footprint. American meddlesomeness in Russian & Chinese affairs.

For interest sake, perhaps an appeal for Merkel feedback on how Europe’s existential crisis is evolving, and whether the region will ever again amount to anything in its own right, or whether it will simply continue as an extension of the American Western projection?

Separately, affecting all, perhaps a quick review of the world economy, how its recuperation from Western banking and sovereign crises is evolving, how China’s recasting is proceeding, and what prospects all this offers going forward.

Starting off, the American view on the Russian issue is perhaps low on nuance, and high on American realism. Look, let’s face it. Long ago, you backed the wrong ideological horse, it undermined your ability to compete, you lost the Cold War, large amounts of territory historically accumulated by you feel no affiliation for you, not least because they could do a whole lot better by sticking with those with superior systems. As a consequence they walked away from you when laid low by your internal troubles as you housecleaned. Now, you are back, and you want back what wasn’t yours to begin with. Doesn’t work that way, pal. Be happy with what you got. By the way, you realise the biggest land claim in history concerns Siberia, with China the aggrieved party. Perhaps they are leaving this for another century, when they will be a lot stronger, and you a lot weaker, than even now.

Meanwhile, back off, will you, be happy with what you got. Perhaps pay more attention to improving your systems some more. Why have you given up so easily on being better mates inside Europe? That association would do you a world of good, strengthen you all, indeed giving you more internal strength for the long struggle you face in the East. I would worry more about those incursions into your sphere than on your Western flank. We are your potential friends. The East will never be that as the ideological fires keep dying off.

Predictably, this opening salvo got Putin’s back up. For the Russian has a deep sense of history. For a 1000 years the “West” has been pressuring Russia. That is where traditionally her biggest confrontation risk resided. And nothing has changed, the way Europe with American encouragement in recent years enticed away one East European peripheral after another.

And so Mother Russia has felt naked in her western borderlands for some time now, and started the process of reversing these historic losses, one territorial bite at the time, either by making things ungovernable in the borderlands or making an outright grab (Crimea).

This has already progressed into a hot war, even if ill-defined, like a festering wound refusing to heal but not live-threatening. This despite loose talk about local nuclear options if need be, but we all know rational minds will prevail.

Still, it makes Merkel nervous, all this saber rattling. Unintended consequences could easily arise. And the only German buffer is Poland. Not nothing, but also not much in a game of chicken at this level. Better to have all cool down. For which reason the backing of American sanctions of Russia as it engages Ukraine, but short of being totally crippling.

It has yet to be shown to be enough. Putin is taking a long view, the Baltics and Belarus are nervous, even as the Greeks see an opportunity here, with Putin responding warmly, both trying to find succour from European pressure.

Will it quickly get out of hand? Probably not, but leaving it festering plays into Russian hands longer term as the West European intrusion into the East slowly falters on Russian resistance. Bogging down, though not like in trenches as in WW1? Greater Europe now effectively has two centres, Germany & Russia, but this is acknowledged by few (and unwanted by Russian nationalists like Putin).

China has also offered a friendly backdoor to Russian energy overtures. Except that the Russian energy-rich Eastern borderlands are also restless and not inclined to do Moscow’s bidding, while China is quietly weighing its very long term options.

The Chinese East Asia push of 2014 has quite suddenly gone very quiet, perhaps because it had rattled its Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese, Philippine & Malay neighbours enough to make its main point. China is Overlord. At the same time, commodity necessity has overnight become less pressing, as China’s own gear change and the changing global energy balance has made alternative oil & gas supply access less pressing? Not on a 50 year view, but certainly on a 10 year view?

And so all smiles and bottoms up as we accept less restlessness in the China Sea.

A true bone of contention is Iran, and by extension all of the Middle East, with the geostrategists extending this to Pakistan & India in the East, and through the Sahara into the deep African West.

Obama is following a balance of power approach, negotiating with Shia Iran, supporting Sunni efforts to end civil wars in the region. It remains to be seen whether this can lower the intensity of conflict.

China needs the oil from the region more than ever, though new fracking technology at home and more territorial China Sea push may reduce this. Time will tell.

Meanwhile, nobody is served by irrational behaviour, reminding of pre-WW1 abdication of the senses. And the Mid-East region is highly flammable, with multiple hotheads potentially in attendance, and this extending through Pakistan and beyond. Too close for Chinese comfort?

Russia sees opportunity here for leverage to be used in its borderland skirmishes with the West, but presumably even Putin realizes (remembering his own Chechens) that irrationality in the region should not be encouraged too far.

For Putin, a medium-intensity Mid-Eastern Troubles festering indefinitely may well be useful, in preventing too much of an energy price fall, and keeping all geopolitical friends on their toes.

For the West, it is not only a tragedy, but a source of wider future conflict if an ascending Iran and others in the region would keep exporting their militancy, with Europe in the immediate firing line, but America not immune.

Indeed, an immediate European problem is the humanitarian one threatening to overwhelm it. Millions of Middle Eastern and North African displaced peoples are on the move. Their natural destination is to try to get into Europe, which doesn’t have effective border controls, least of all in the large Mediterranean.

Read the full story here.

* For more in-depth business news, visit biznews.com or simply sign up for the daily newsletter.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Rand - Dollar
18.90
+0.2%
Rand - Pound
23.86
+0.2%
Rand - Euro
20.37
+0.3%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.31
+0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.2%
Platinum
908.05
0.0%
Palladium
1,014.94
0.0%
Gold
2,232.75
-0.0%
Silver
24.95
-0.1%
Brent Crude
87.00
+1.8%
Top 40
68,346
0.0%
All Share
74,536
0.0%
Resource 10
57,251
0.0%
Industrial 25
103,936
0.0%
Financial 15
16,502
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Company Snapshot
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE
Government tenders

Find public sector tender opportunities in South Africa here.

Government tenders
This portal provides access to information on all tenders made by all public sector organisations in all spheres of government.
Browse tenders